Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3D mark vantage thread
#1
Post your scores obtained with 3dmark vantage.
You can get a 1time use trial key per registered emailadres.
Use the performance mode (it's on this by default)

Performance mode scores
ChronicNL  : 40323 Specs
Imbapally  : 11039 Specs
sakraycore : 9588
iakoboss7  : 7908 Specs
CKL          : 6100 Specs
pcsx2fan   : 2713 Specs


[Image: vantaget.jpg]
[Image: 1454055.png]
Reply

Sponsored links

#2
lol, I guess you got what you paid for, and I got mine. Sad


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
AMD Athlon II 245 @ 3.55ghz, 9600GT @730mhz 1115mhz, vista sp2 32bit
Reply
#3
This might sound stupid and I'm in no way trying to flame this thread or anything but what good is 3dmark vantage? I mean I've ran benchmarks on it before but at the end of the day real world apps are what really matters.
Working full time to build new PC by the end of the year
Reply
#4
3d mark vantage tests your pc how good it is on playing games... only that not real world applications... for that you need pc mark and they actually give very reliable results.
OS: Win 7 Ultimate x64 sp1, MoBo: Asus P5QD Turbo, CPU: Q6600 @ 3,0Ghz, RAM: Trancend 2x2gb 6-6-6-18 800 MHz, GPU: HD 4850 1gb.
Pcsx2: Always Latest
Reply
#5
3dmark vantage ... 1 thing to say : BLEH!!!
This thing never works correctly for me. I can play most new PC games with all the details high at like 25-30 fps, but this app is giving me all sorts of crap. Even with the lowest settings i get flickering/blinking/missing textures, some bloom/glow effects don't show or show up corrupted, it even bluescreened me once or twice.
After trying a lot of versions that appeared (including the latest one from their site today) i give up on this app forever Sad.

Reply
#6
I think what matters is to use the same benchmark software(very difficult and inconvinent to measure with different software). 3Dmark vantage may not be the best, but as ChronicNL started it, I think it is good to keep using the same software if you want to take part in this, the trial is free anyway.
AMD Athlon II 245 @ 3.55ghz, 9600GT @730mhz 1115mhz, vista sp2 32bit
Reply
#7
GPU:8600GT OC 756/900
CPU:E7200 OC 3.8 GHz

3DMark SCORE:P2713
GPU SCORE:2249
CPU SCORE:7118
[Image: th_3DMark_Vantage_8600GT_OC_756_900.jpg]

Like 3DMark 06, Overclocking your CPU will give you lotsa more scores.

@ CKL
I dunno why your CPU Score(20746) was higher than mine(7118), I think my E7200 at 3.8 GHz is outperforming your AMD Athlon II X2 245 at 3.55 GHz.
durable PC since 2008
CPU : E7200 @ 2.53 GHz 1.04 V / OC 3.7 GHz 1.36 V (390*9.5, 4GB DDR2 780)
GPU : 8600GT (GDDR3, 256 MB) / OC (750 / 900)
BOARD : GA-EP31-DS3L (rev 1.0) broken and bought a second hand one replaced
PSU : 300 W
OS : Windows 7 Home Basic x86
Reply
#8
I don't really know how the points are calculated. Perhaps your graphic card is holding your cpu back. I guess 3D mark vantage is just like those pc games out there depend a lot on graphic card.

When I ran my test, I actually had something else running at the background, so I am quite surprised to see your cpu score that much lower than mine.
AMD Athlon II 245 @ 3.55ghz, 9600GT @730mhz 1115mhz, vista sp2 32bit
Reply
#9
Vantage is way too random from what I've seen and it only works in vista/7 and the CPU score is improved by physx on a graphics card?... not reliable for comparing systems in my opinion.
Core i5 3570k -- Geforce GTX 670  --  Windows 7 x64
Reply
#10
nvidia users shouldnt use the physx option in the test.

@chronicNL you should also post what settings to use in vantage Tongue cause you can alter different ones, also not all settings are suitable for everyone.

certain gpu's should use entry, high or something else depending on how good the gpu is for accurate results, sounds strange but thats how it is.
OS: Win 7 Ultimate x64 sp1, MoBo: Asus P5QD Turbo, CPU: Q6600 @ 3,0Ghz, RAM: Trancend 2x2gb 6-6-6-18 800 MHz, GPU: HD 4850 1gb.
Pcsx2: Always Latest
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)