Any chance of more threading in the future
#21
I've seen one really bad superpi 1M result myself, and then another which was really good.
I fear for AMD if they really just do 23s @ 3.2Ghz... Isn't that lower than PhenomII even?
Reply

Sponsored links

#22
It could also be a hardware bug. I mean you don't do a new revision which cost min 100,000 to 500,000 dollars (could be much more actually) to gain few megahertz. Or it could be a bad design choice.
Reply
#23
hmm, the 23s result was actually done with L caches disabled (apparently)
the recent test done by the czech should have had the caches enabled

it wouldn't be impossible to enable the caches if its just a microcode disabling them.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)