Login

densetsu86 · 03-26-2015, 03:15 AM

I know more then you trust me. if you think memory, memory speed, memory bus, types of memory, memory bandwidth, and l2 chache means nothing that shows you know nothing. I don't trust a single thing you say now dude. yes instruction set play a role (ie the architecture like maxwell) but those are minor improvements since there are better better gpus using the older kepler architecture. these are all needed to make a gpu. they are not random nothing.

**Blyss Sarania** · 03-26-2015, 03:28 AM

Let's stop this before it goes bad.

densetsu86 · 03-26-2015, 03:37 AM

yea I agree. don't know why people always need to make things personal.

dogen · (This post was last modified: 03-26-2015, 03:55 AM by dogen.)

The 960 is still pretty good, but realize that by not using AMD you're missing out on a card that's 10-15% faster. The gap will increase as bandwidth requirements increase.

**TehGuy** · 03-26-2015, 03:56 AM

(03-26-2015, 03:52 AM)dogen Wrote: The 960 is still pretty good, but realize that by not using AMD you're missing out on 15-20% performance.

For just a tad bit more as well..

The GTX 960 is ok and all, but I agree in thinking the 280/285/280X is the way to go at that price-point unless you think ShadowPlay and other Nvidia features are more compelling Tongue2

**Nobbs66** · 03-26-2015, 04:45 AM

(03-26-2015, 03:56 AM)TehGuy Wrote: For just a tad bit more as well..

The GTX 960 is ok and all, but I agree in thinking the 280/285/280X is the way to go at that price-point unless you think ShadowPlay and other Nvidia features are more compelling

Shadowplay isn't worth it

**Blyss Sarania** · 03-26-2015, 05:21 AM

Plus AMD has Raptr anyway, so that shouldn't be a decision port.

**ssakash** · 03-26-2015, 06:21 AM

(03-26-2015, 03:07 AM)Coma Wrote: I think you know nothing about pc hardware, . I won't flood the topic more, find yourself a good hardware forum : )

making statements like this when, densetsu86 made valid points isn't really good. I hope you don't continue saying stuffs like this Tongue2

(03-26-2015, 03:07 AM)Coma Wrote: and you should trust me

now say me, how could he trust you if, you have no points to back up what you're saying ?

(03-25-2015, 11:13 PM)hygsuperslayer Wrote: What are everyone's thoughts on these models:

GTX 560 Ti
GTX 750 Ti
GT 740

I'm also keeping tabs on an Radeon R7 at the moment. I'm looking to meet the minimum, but also want some comfortable overhead.

what PSU are you using ? , personally I would recommend waiting for the launch of GTX-950.

**Blyss Sarania** · 03-26-2015, 06:22 AM

(03-26-2015, 06:21 AM)ssakash Wrote: making statements like this when, densetsu86 made valid points isn't really good. I hope you don't continue saying stuffs like this

now say me, how could he trust you if, you have no points to back up what you're saying ?

Don't try to continue the argument please.

hygsuperslayer · 03-27-2015, 02:53 PM

(03-26-2015, 06:21 AM)ssakash Wrote: what PSU are you using ? , personally I would recommend waiting for the launch of GTX-950.

I hope to keep the PSU I currently have, any more money into this computer to play a few games is coming to it's plateau. So with great caution...

...it's a 500w (or 450) Thermaltake Black Widow.

It won't be an issue to get any molex pin converters for 6-pin power requiring cards I may view.

To spear head any other questions ahead of time, I have 64 bit Win7 on an isolated 80gig SSD, data and other emulators are on a 1tb usb3 attached external WD drive (pcsx2 emulator is on the SSD explicitly along with the games)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me