Building a PCSX2 machine -- 2 low-clock CPUs or 1 high-clock CPU?
#11
Ah fair enough
Reply

Sponsored links

#12
Just get one Dual Core CPU with a high default clock speed, or get a Quad Core if pcsx2 is going to support 3 threads in the near future.
DO NOT get a single core cpu, these days it is bad for anything.
i5 2500K @ 4.8 Ghz - 1.31 V
Asrock Z68 Extreme 3 Gen 3
4 GB Mushkin Radioactive 1600 mhz @ 1866 (8-10-8-27 1T)
ASUS DCU2 HD 6870 (1050/1196) @ 1.3V
Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 32bit
Reply
#13
Would a single core CPU with Hyperthreading be "ok"? Maybe if clocked high enough?
Reply
#14
(02-17-2010, 09:13 AM)Rezard Wrote: Would a single core CPU with Hyperthreading be "ok"? Maybe if clocked high enough?

No it won't, it will be slow as hell. Are single core CPUs still being sold??
[Image: newsig.jpg]
Reply
#15
(02-17-2010, 09:20 AM)Bositman Wrote: Are single core CPUs still being sold??

I thought the same thing. Laugh
Reply
#16
You could always get a Dual Core CPU with HT like some core i5 variants.

That way you save money, get a faster dual core CPU and a 4 thread capable one, thus making fair use of PCSX2 future implementations =D
SAGER NP8690 | i7-620M 2.66Ghz | 6GB RAM | ATI 5870M 1GB GDDR5 | FullHD 1080p 15.6'' | 500GB HDD 7200RPM | WINDOWS 7
Reply
#17
(02-19-2010, 12:11 AM)dotHack Wrote: You could always get a Dual Core CPU with HT like some core i5 variants.

That way you save money, get a faster dual core CPU and a 4 thread capable one, thus making fair use of PCSX2 future implementations =D

That's a great suggestion, though I'm going true quad-core because I think it will be far more future proof.

I liken hyperthreading to virtual memory - useful in a pinch, but ultimately not reliable for dedicated tasks.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)