Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can this pc run P4 & ToTA at a reasonable speed?
#1
CPU: Pentium Dual Core E6700 3.2GHz
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5450 1GB
RAM: Kingston 4GB DDR2
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Unsure
Reply

Sponsored links

#2
well try it!!
Main Hub:i5-4670(3.4Ghz Factory Clocked),ATi Radeon HD7770(GDDR5+128-bit+1GB),Win 10 SL(x64),ASUS H8M-E,8GB DDR3 RAM
Reply
#3
http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-Sticky-Wi...y-computer
CPU : I7 2600K Oc'ed @ 4.2Ghz
Mobo : Intel P67 southbridge
GPU : NVIDIA Geforce GTX 750 Ti
RAM : 6 Go
Reply
#4
If this CPU is equivalent to Core2Duo E6700 then yes.

Main Rig: i7-3770k @4.5ghz | 16GB DDR3 | Nvidia GTX 980 TI | Win 10 X64
Laptop: MSI GT62VR | i7-6700HQ | 16GB DDR4 | Nvidia GTX 1060 | Win 10 X64

Reply
#5
(10-09-2011, 09:17 PM)Nexxxus Wrote: If this CPU is equivalent to Core2Duo E6700 then yes.

Hey just saying hello to a so similar cpu, oh wait he has my cpu c:
and yes the difference between duo and Pentium dual is cache, which doesn't matter in pcsx2
[Image: 8rg00e-4.png]
Reply
#6
(10-10-2011, 11:07 AM)thatwasonce Wrote: Hey just saying hello to a so similar cpu, oh wait he has my cpu c:
and yes the difference between duo and Pentium dual is cache, which doesn't matter in pcsx2

Cache does matters based on my tests.
Reply
#7
excuse me but what tests Tongue
Reply
#8
Well, I tried playing Abyss for a bit from the beginning and the speed was pretty good in a couple battles. Haven't tried Persona yet.
Reply
#9
@abdo123

I don't want to embarrass you Core i3, i5, i7 owners, but I guess I'd have to now... What tests, you asked? Check the FFX-2 CPU Benchmark Test thread. But if you're too lazy or don't know where it is, I'd be gladly to post it here for you.

Core 2 Duo E6300 @3.73GHz (2MB L2 Cache) Vs. Core 2 Quad Q9550 @3.73GHz (12MB Cache)
Code:
63.24 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.73 GHz OC - tuanming
62.38 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400S - 3.73 GHz OC - tuanming
53.69 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 - 3.73 GHz OC - tuanming

Core 2 Quad Q9400S @3GHz (6MB L2 Cache) Vs. Core 2 Quad Q9550 @3GHz (12MB Cache)
Code:
51.36 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.0 GHz OC, DDR3 1059 MHz - tuanming
50.55 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400S - 3.00 GHz OC - tuanming

Core 2 Quad Q9400S @2.83GHz (6MB L2 Cache) Vs. Core 2 Quad Q9550 @2.83GHz (12MB Cache)
Code:
48.78 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 2.83 GHz Stock - tuanming
47.48 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400S - 2.83 GHz OC - tuanming

55.17 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.2 GHz OC, DDR2 906 MHz 1t 4-4-4-12 - tuanming
54.98 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 - 3.52 GHz OC - cyber
54.89 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400 - 3.6 GHz OC - Shadow Lady
54.42 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 650 - 3.2 GHz Stock (HT on, Turbo Boost on) - Rezard
54.24 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 650 - 3.2 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost off) - ilovejedd
54.05 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition - 3.6 GHz OC -denimu
53.87 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.33 GHz OC - Pedrosilvaa
53.78 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5700 - 3.6 GHz OC - Secret Dragoon
53.69 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 - 3.73 GHz OC - tuanming
53.33 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Phenom II X6 1055T - 3.33 GHz OC - ilovejedd (Turbo Core on)
53.24 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon II x4 640 - 3.6 GHz OC - Spikexp
\End/

As you can see here, Pedrosilvaa Q9550 clocked at 3.2GHz (200MHz difference), yet he only beat me by a mere 0.5 fps. When my Q9550 clocked at 3.2GHz, its fps is in a different league. My Q9550 at 3GHz is almost as good as a stock Core i5 760 - 2.8 GHz I'm very proud of my Q9550, I can't wait to see what the Socket 2011 CPUs has to offer. Most likely it would be my next system upgrade =)

51.86 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.21 GHz OC - Pedrosilvaa
51.70 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 760 - 2.8 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost off) - ilovejedd
51.36 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.0 GHz OC, DDR2 1059 MHz - tuanming
51.04 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 - 3.5 GHz OC - Shadow Lady
50.96 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6800 - 3.33 GHz Stock - Bonobi
50.55 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400S - 3.00 GHz OC - tuanming
50.47 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i3 530 - 2.93 GHz Stock - ilovejedd
50.31 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 2500K - 2.5 GHz (Underclock) - Rezard
50.16 FPS - SLUS 20672 - AMD Athlon II X2 245 - 3.6 GHz OC - CKL
49.46 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.10 GHz OC - Pedrosilvaa
49.46 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 - 3.16 GHz OC - pcsx2fan

Note: The results from above are outdated, now I have an even faster DDR2 ram (DDR2 1100MHz) compared to the old one DDR2 1066. This is the one I have now: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...%20g.skill Currently, I'm at 3.97GHz and the ram is running at 1168MHz. I have no doubt that I would get higher fps if I do a re-bench using the higher speed ram. So you could say that my system performs like an Core i series in a way Tongue Pop in a SSD and blast off! This is why I'm still on a Core 2 Quad generation Wink Ivy Bridge is most likely my next upgrade Evil

Not to mention that those results were tested on a PCI-E 1.1 specs, but now I have a PCI-E 2.0 motherboard so there are room for higher scores. Also, on average, I've concluded that the Core i5 2500k is about 500Mhz faster than mine Q9550 based on the old specs I used.. So, if the 2500k is clocked at 3.5GHz, then to matched that speed or performance my Q9550 would have to be clocked at 4GHz.
Reply
#10
Code:
67.37 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.97 GHz OC - tuanming
66.12 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core i5 2500K - 3.3 GHz Stock (Turbo Boost off) - Rezard
Quote:So, if the 2500k is clocked at 4GHz, then to matched that speed or performance my Q9550 would have to be clocked at 3.5GHz.

What? Tongue2



Taking in count this result the difference in cache is rather minimal, the Q9550 has twice the cache a Q9400S does, the difference is barely 1-2% and taking in count margin of error it could pretty much be null (I can get that kind of difference in FPS between reboots and even bigger difference at it Tongue2)
Code:
63.24 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 - 3.73 GHz OC - tuanming
62.38 FPS - SLUS 20672 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400S - 3.73 GHz OC - tuanming
Core i5 3570k -- Geforce GTX 670  --  Windows 7 x64
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)