Posts: 587
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
16
06-08-2012, 12:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2012, 12:39 PM by Alexander.)
So you're saying I should compress?
These games are awfully big ya know...
Posts: 587
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
16
Well my SSD is 256GB and doing pretty well on space, though it could be better.
I could move them to my secondary 750GB HDD but would I notice a difference in speed?
Posts: 1.909
Threads: 28
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation:
75
Don't feed the troll please. Yes, that's you Mr. Moore.
Posts: 587
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
16
06-09-2012, 09:29 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2012, 09:30 AM by Alexander.)
If I'm trolling then I didn't even realize. How would that be?
I'm being honest.
Seriously guise. GUISE. SERIOUSLY. GUISE!!!
Posts: 308
Threads: 2
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
11
Simple answer: the PS2 has a DVD drive made of solidified arse and failure. So it doesn't matter which drive you put them on. No matter how crap your HDD is, it can't be as slow as a PS2 drive.
Honestly, you're better of running them from your bigger drive, and compressing the .iso files using the plugin as previously discussed.
Posts: 587
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
16
So running them at faster than the native drive speed makes no difference?
Posts: 308
Threads: 2
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
11
Any HDD made in past decade is faster than the PS2's DVD drive. So the benefits of SSD are negligible. As for compressing them, this places a small overhead on the CPU for decompression, but it won't affect most games. A possible exception would be something which constantly streams, such as Grand Theft Auto: SA.
So just use your big, non-SSD drive, and reserve the SSD for stuff which actually takes advantage of the high read speeds.