Def Jam Fight for NY
#11
88% 25 fps at -2
82% 15 fps at -1
87% 17 fps at 0

JUST checked it
Reply

Sponsored links

#12
Again. Changes EE timing. Go try SotC with it.
[Image: gmYzFII.png]
[Image: dvedn3-5.png]
Reply
#13
(10-24-2015, 11:21 PM)Nobbs66 Wrote: Again. Changes EE timing. Go try SotC with it.

that IS SotC. i don't own Def Jam and I'm not about to download it just to prove a point
Reply
#14
I highly doubt that's with the overclock, especially when it slows down for everyone else.
[Image: gmYzFII.png]
[Image: dvedn3-5.png]
Reply
#15
are you calling me a liar? (that's not even ingame yet)


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
           
Reply
#16
Get in game and test in a single scene. Obviously when you have different things being rendered in a menu, the framerate can change.
[Image: gmYzFII.png]
[Image: dvedn3-5.png]
Reply
#17
What you see here might be because of mtvu. The question would be what happens if you disable mtvu and/or enable vu cycle stealing.

As we all know SotC is really pushing on the vu. That you see an fps increase while overclocking the EE might be a funny coincidence and related to synchronization overhead.
Reply
#18
it loses about 2-3 frames without MTVU

also here's screens ingame.it was fluctuating quite a bit

with VU stealign at 2, and EE at -2 it dips as low as 60% ee, while 0 is almost always 90%


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
           
Reply
#19
So now you get the expected behaviour or? Overclocking ee results in lower fps?

I think what you saw before is really just an artifact because of the speedhack. It probably even shows how one can further improve mtvu.
Reply
#20
it actually doesn't. 1, at worst. the EE actually loses % too for using the overclock
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)