Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Kingdom hearts 2 fps :(
#1
hi, im new here but i was reading earlier and found a thread like this i think but couldnt find it when i searched 2 minutes ago (im kinda bad with memory),anyways i tried the beta but it didnt work so i went back to 0.9.6 getting to the point, kingdom hearts fps starts out around 60 but lowers at gameplay and start screen to 30-.
im on a labtop with specs as follows.


Operating System: Windows Vista™ Home Premium (6.0, Build 6001) Service Pack 1 (6001.vistasp1_gdr.090805-0102)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Acer
System Model: Aspire 4730Z
BIOS: InsydeH2O Version V1.15
Processor: Intel® Pentium® Dual CPU T3400 @ 2.16GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.2GHz
Memory: 3002MB RAM
Page File: 2018MB used, 4202MB available
Windows Dir: C:\Windows
DirectX Version: DirectX 10
edit: i tried speed hacks they didnt work
Reply

Sponsored links

#2
what's your video card? oh and your CPU is too weak.
Reply
#3
yea...figures...oh well il just wait till my desktop gets fixed :/
Reply
#4
Well Intel GMA isnt really good for PCSX2^^
Waiting is a really good idea.
Many games running full speed. o.O
Win XP SP3
Intel C2D E5200 @ 3,125 Ghz
2 GB RAM @ 800 Mhz
Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 4670

Weeeiiiird Laugh




Reply
#5
(01-20-2010, 06:31 AM)sakraycore Wrote: oh and your CPU is too weak.

oh I love this reply. I'm running on an E2200 whish is 2.2 ghx, and the game is running fine. it's a GPU problem, NOT a cpu one. next time you try to explain things, make sure you have your facts straight, thanks.
Reply
#6
CPU is still weak, not being able to run games at constant 60fps is expected specially when the OP is using the older pcsx2 0.9.6 release which is slower than the betas (and if I recall correctly Kingdom Hearts II benefits quite a bit from the betas).

Still it's true the GPU is the biggest bottleneck here but expecting constant 60fps is just not so realistic in those conditions anyway.
Core i5 3570k -- Geforce GTX 670  --  Windows 7 x64
Reply
#7
(01-20-2010, 03:24 PM)Saiki Wrote:
(01-20-2010, 06:31 AM)sakraycore Wrote: oh and your CPU is too weak.

oh I love this reply. I'm running on an E2200 whish is 2.2 ghx, and the game is running fine. it's a GPU problem, NOT a cpu one. next time you try to explain things, make sure you have your facts straight, thanks.

You're getting full speed with FFX?
Reply
#8
Nah they're both the same chip architecture basically, although the T3400 runs with lower FSB so that'd make it slower still Tongue

Edit: My post goes to a statement about T3400 and E2200 being from Core and Core2 architechtures and the former being slower because of it.
@sakraycore: way to edit your post while I typed :C
Core i5 3570k -- Geforce GTX 670  --  Windows 7 x64
Reply
#9
(01-20-2010, 11:40 PM)sakraycore Wrote:
(01-20-2010, 03:24 PM)Saiki Wrote:
(01-20-2010, 06:31 AM)sakraycore Wrote: oh and your CPU is too weak.

oh I love this reply. I'm running on an E2200 whish is 2.2 ghx, and the game is running fine. it's a GPU problem, NOT a cpu one. next time you try to explain things, make sure you have your facts straight, thanks.

You're getting full speed with FFX?
yes, I am.
Reply
#10
Yeah, this CPU is indeed (just barely) able to deliver 60fps most of the time in FFX and KH games, when speedhacks are used.
It does have the core2 design, giving it the same fast SSE units (with DaZ support) that pcsx2 loves.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)