01-25-2016, 01:13 PM
Oibaf ppa == mesa ppa
Honestly, I don't think, it is useful to use it when you see Mesa progress rate.
Debian multiarch is right but half baked. Debian tries to fix the original issue (aka 1 path fit them all). Unfortunately, due to politics reason (aka if I uses only a single arch then I don't need correct path) , people prefers to keep the broken and dubious path. Archlinux is the same mess, what happen if you want to cross-compile an arm32 bits on it. Multilib is a poor solution of a very specific corner case. Multiarch issues have plagued linux since the beginning (it was already a mess 10 years ago to cross-compile to arm).
Honestly, I don't think, it is useful to use it when you see Mesa progress rate.
Debian multiarch is right but half baked. Debian tries to fix the original issue (aka 1 path fit them all). Unfortunately, due to politics reason (aka if I uses only a single arch then I don't need correct path) , people prefers to keep the broken and dubious path. Archlinux is the same mess, what happen if you want to cross-compile an arm32 bits on it. Multilib is a poor solution of a very specific corner case. Multiarch issues have plagued linux since the beginning (it was already a mess 10 years ago to cross-compile to arm).