Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
0
6 months ago i used the 4268 build to play both Resident Evil Outbreaks at a speed at near full speed ingame. However when i recently wanted to play them both using PCSX2 0.9.8 the speed dropped significantly to around 18 fps. I have also tested 0.9.8 on the same laptop thats only difference is it is less used and the result was around 28 fps ingame.
My Specs are:
AMD Phenom II n930 Quad Core @2.00 GHz
4GBs of RAM
AMD Radeon HD 6500m/5600/5700 Series
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
PCSX2 0.9.8 (4600)
mVU Flag Hack
mVU Block Hack
Resident Evil Outbreak ISO and DVD (no speed difference both slow)
Posts: 7.449
Threads: 153
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
125
Sorry, you must be mistaken. There is no way that system could have ever hit full speed.
|| Core i7 8700K @ 5.0GHZ || Gigabyte AUROS 1080 Ti 11GB @ 2050MHZ/12GHZ Memory || 32GB DDR4 @ 3000MHZ || 1TB Samsung Evo 850 SSD + 128GB 830 SSD || 4TB HDD + 1TB HDD || Windows 10 64-bit Professional || EVGA G3 850w PSU || MB: Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 ||
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
0
It cant? Oh damn.
Thanks for the speed reply, but im sure it hit a reasonable speed thats more then the speed now, but i guess i must've been imagining that, thanks again.
Posts: 7.449
Threads: 153
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
125
Well, the emulator will actually get slower the more mature it gets, because it's emulating the PS2 correctly more and more.
|| Core i7 8700K @ 5.0GHZ || Gigabyte AUROS 1080 Ti 11GB @ 2050MHZ/12GHZ Memory || 32GB DDR4 @ 3000MHZ || 1TB Samsung Evo 850 SSD + 128GB 830 SSD || 4TB HDD + 1TB HDD || Windows 10 64-bit Professional || EVGA G3 850w PSU || MB: Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 ||
Posts: 138
Threads: 15
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
0
So if you have a older one it will run games faster???
Posts: 923
Threads: 7
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
47
Location: Argentina
It "may" run some games faster, if at all. If you find a revision that suits your needs, just use it and keep it around.
Posts: 92
Threads: 3
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
3
Location: Canada
AMD Phenom II N/P series are very weak, the equivalent Llano blows them out of the water at the same speed. Put in "K10Stat" in Google, it should work with them as well.
-Core i7 6700k @ 4.5 GHz
-GIGABYTE Z170X-Gaming 5
-G.SKILL Ripjaws V 16GB DDR4 2400 @ 14-13-13-30-1T
-EVGA GTX 970 4GB @ 1380/1853 MHz
-Crucial MX100 512GB, Silicon Power S60 120GB, Toshiba 2TB 7200 RPM
-PC P & C Silencer 750 Quad
-Windows 7 x64
-----
-Core i7 4710MQ
-16GB DDR3 1866
-GTX 965M 4GB @ 1127/1353 MHz
-Mushkin ECO2 240GB, HGST 1TB 7200 RPM
-Windows 7 x64
Posts: 7.449
Threads: 153
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
125
Yes, but it will still get slower. They have said themselves; expect newer builds to be slower, not faster, but emulate more accurately.
|| Core i7 8700K @ 5.0GHZ || Gigabyte AUROS 1080 Ti 11GB @ 2050MHZ/12GHZ Memory || 32GB DDR4 @ 3000MHZ || 1TB Samsung Evo 850 SSD + 128GB 830 SSD || 4TB HDD + 1TB HDD || Windows 10 64-bit Professional || EVGA G3 850w PSU || MB: Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 ||
Posts: 2.128
Threads: 8
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation:
112
Comparing 0.9.6 and 0.9.9 without MTvu usually gives me same or much less stress on cpu(in those games which got a boost from gif rewrite mainly;P), and with MTvu althrough it's heavier, it's most of the time much faster, only GSdx is heavier and slower, but mostly couse it simply draws more things which were invisible before;].