PCSX2 is MUCH slower on Win7 x64
#21
Sry CobraSA. But the FPS you are getting in XP x86 MUST be wrong. Maybe there is a problem in the FPS counter, i dunno.

I have the same CPU as you, and I haven't seen the FPS go higer than 120fps.
And I also have it overclocked to 3GHz.
200fps must be a bad read. 70-80fps are more normal values for your CPU.

PD: Note: This game as a high deviation in the framerate depending on the place. The tests must be done in the exact same place, otherwise they are not valid.
Reply

Sponsored links

#22
deleted
jesalvein broke my balls, farewell
Reply
#23
I'm most convinced than a big deal of the differences pointed out in more than one thread is due to the Power Saving feature...
Imagination is where we are truly real
Reply
#24
deleted
jesalvein broke my balls, farewell
Reply
#25
Assuming you use GSdx, how did you make it display the FPS as an overlay (beyond the window title bar display)?
Reply
#26
deleted
jesalvein broke my balls, farewell
Reply
#27
(08-01-2010, 08:39 PM)CobraSA Wrote: As I said earlier I use FRAPS to show FPS.

http://www.fraps.com/
Oh, never used fraps, didn't know it overlays the FPS. Thanks. Could be nice if GSdx had it too.

BTW, did you try to observe the FPS with fraps disabled? fraps _may_ affect the result, and it also might affect it differently for XP/7. How different, if at all, is the fraps count from the internal FPS count (title bar)?
Reply
#28
deleted
jesalvein broke my balls, farewell
Reply
#29
I know fraps and its relatively good reputation, I just didn't use it, at least not during recent years. Still worth a try IMO, since you still have no solution...
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)