Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sse 2, 3 and 4.1
#1
Just wondering if someone could explain the differences between the 3 options and how it might, if at all, affect gameplay.
[Image: jmt41l-2.png]
SSD: 250GB | HDD: 2TB | GPU: MSI GTX 970 4G Gaming
Reply

Sponsored links

#2
a slight performance difference, and if you use an amd gfx card, the sse2 plugin might render some shaders/textures the wrong colour.
Reply
#3
well even though its slight, my laptop uses an NVidea GeForce 230M, so which would be the best to use performance wise (even if it is only an ever so small increase). all other specs are in my sig.
[Image: jmt41l-2.png]
SSD: 250GB | HDD: 2TB | GPU: MSI GTX 970 4G Gaming
Reply
#4
the highest your cpu is capable of

AMD - SSE2
Early Core 2 - SSSE3
Late Core 2 and I7 SSE4.1
Reply
#5
CPU EXT : MMX, SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1), EM64T

4.1 then. thanks, just wanted to be sure Smile
[Image: jmt41l-2.png]
SSD: 250GB | HDD: 2TB | GPU: MSI GTX 970 4G Gaming
Reply
#6
(08-31-2011, 06:36 PM)Squall Leonhart Wrote: the highest your cpu is capable of

AMD - SSE2

Bobcat supports SSSE3, not that it matters; no Bobcat can do much with PCSX2.
Reply
#7
why do you think i excluded it xD
Reply
#8
(08-31-2011, 06:36 PM)Squall Leonhart Wrote: the highest your cpu is capable of

AMD - SSE2
Early Core 2 - SSSE3
Late Core 2 and I7 SSE4.1

you should be more precise with SSE4.1 Wink you should say anything made by Intel and later than ( including ) core2duo E7xxx series Tongue
Reply
#9
(08-31-2011, 06:07 PM)Squall Leonhart Wrote: a slight performance difference, and if you use an amd gfx card, the sse2 plugin might render some shaders/textures the wrong colour.

By "Slight Performance difference", which way is better?

IE, is SSE2 the slowest, SSSE3 the middle and SSE4.1 the fastest, or vice versa?
Reply
#10
(08-31-2011, 11:30 PM)Polantaris Wrote: IE, is SSE2 the slowest, SSSE3 the middle and SSE4.1 the fastest

Yes
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)