Posts: 9
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
03-19-2014, 12:22 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-19-2014, 12:42 AM by kazumizorah.)
i5-4670k @ 4.5Ghz (MSI Z87-G45 mobo, EVO 212 cooler)
Radeon r9 280x 3Gb Toxic OC
8gb ram 1866Mhz
Got some new hardware being shipped in this week and I wanted to get an approximation of what kind of performance I should expect on average when running the more demanding games (preferably with as little speedhacks as possible, or just without mVU Flag) using the following configuration:
6x Native
PCSX2Fx Shader
16x AF
Posts: 12.837
Threads: 48
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
252
You will get slowdowns with that much load on your gpu. It will look fine at 3x native ith the fx shader and 4x msaa and 4x AF.
Posts: 9
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
Are you sure? My old (now broken) GTX670 ran most games at 6x native pretty well, slowdowns happened but not too many.
Posts: 5.076
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
154
Do you actually see a difference between 6x and 5x?
Say I am setting your emulator and would only select between 6x and 5x... could you tell me which settings I used?
Posts: 12.837
Threads: 48
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
252
I would just stick with your 670. Not worth the extra money
Posts: 21.718
Threads: 401
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
476
Location: 私の夢の中
There is only a VERY mild super sampling affect once you set internal above your monitors resolution. And there is no difference if you are using MSAA.
Possibly if you have a 4k monitor then 6x is useful.
Gaming Rig: Intel i7 6700k @ 4.8Ghz | GTX 1070 TI | 32GB RAM | 960GB(480GB+480GB RAID0) SSD | 2x 1TB HDD
Posts: 12.837
Threads: 48
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
252
Pretty good performance. If you are getting it cheaper oustide of the states then good for you. Mining is jacking up the prices like crazy over here.
Posts: 12.837
Threads: 48
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
252
OVer here in the states the gtx 770 is cheper than the 280x