Posts: 145
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
Location: SC, USA
4-4.2ghz on mine.
If I had a better chip, could top out at 4.4 (My BCLK (aka FSB) tops out at 210, so 210x21 (Turbo multi for 920) = 4410.
Usually keep it at 4.0 though, the voltage "My" chip (will differ batch to batch) takes at 4.2 is 1.45v with LLC, 4.0 only takes 1.35v LLC so 200mhz isnt worth that kind of jump to me 24/7.
Posts: 38
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
@Rama Try MGS3, 7fps ftl!
@mird99, on the other hand, software mode emulates practically everything, even PP effects.
Posts: 145
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
Location: SC, USA
I've yet to test mgs3 in software actually... i'll check that out later today ;p
Posts: 38
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
@lightchris, actually Gabest decided to not emulate PP in hardware i believe, he actually adds special checks that disable PP for as many games as he wants to add.
Again MGS3 for example, when using the Thermal Goggles, the PP effect seems to become bugged and starts trying to works as it should, turning the screen green and resulting in less than 1fps. You can see this in lots of places, when using the codec too, you can't see who you'r talking too and snake is perfectly rendered, instead of the PP effect used on the PS2.
Posts: 478
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
Location: Brazilian Blackmarket
03-06-2009, 11:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-06-2009, 11:16 AM by Gentleman.)
Anyway, like mird said, software renderer only support the native resolution, atm any game looks 100% better on hardware mode. Hardware stills the way to go. Maybe in the future software mode will take over, but not right now.
Posts: 145
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
Location: SC, USA
Some people care more about accuracy than larger resolution. Even when using hardware mode, I often don't use larger internal resolutions 99% of the time. In that case, Software works just fine and provides greater emulation quality.