12-28-2014, 11:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-28-2014, 11:25 PM by EatMyShorts.)
Slightly outside the realm of "will my computer run the PSX2", a little more ambiguous, so I feel it deserves its own thread.
The Intel U processors are "ultra efficient".
The Intel M, being "Mobile".
I believe in general the M's are regarded as having a higher operating frequency, and generally being better.
For those who have experience with them, do they find in terms of running this emulator, that the M version performs significantly better?
I was comparing the processors from a Lenovo thinkpad, to a Hewlet Packard, each with i5's, but one being the former, one the later, and I was curious as to how big a difference in performance exists, given the substantial price difference.
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/851/Int...4288U.html
Taking the exact comparison there by example, they both seem virtually identical.
Is there something I'm missing out on there?
Is the M version actually superior in some way; just there's some information not being disclosed in them charts?
The Intel U processors are "ultra efficient".
The Intel M, being "Mobile".
I believe in general the M's are regarded as having a higher operating frequency, and generally being better.
For those who have experience with them, do they find in terms of running this emulator, that the M version performs significantly better?
I was comparing the processors from a Lenovo thinkpad, to a Hewlet Packard, each with i5's, but one being the former, one the later, and I was curious as to how big a difference in performance exists, given the substantial price difference.
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/851/Int...4288U.html
Taking the exact comparison there by example, they both seem virtually identical.
Is there something I'm missing out on there?
Is the M version actually superior in some way; just there's some information not being disclosed in them charts?