still slow...

[Bositman]

I think the problems is not cpu or gpu in hardware but what is about programmers to implement and support to the program. I know pcsx2 is open source program and no one can obligate to an other. just hope for other programer to support all of already there in the market. I thinks SSE4.1 is not give big fps in game like 20fps to 40fps increased.

Sorry but if you're not a PCSX2 coder you really can't possibly know if SSE4 or any other SSE instruction is useful for the emulator,or how much speed boost it gives.
The team is using all instruction sets that are useful for this emulator and it just happens that the instructions AMD does not support are the most useful. Blame amd for not supporting better instructions not the PCSX2 team...

[Register]

I know sse4.1 is for intel cpu and AMD only have sse3 and sse4.1a but what is all about features in AMD CPU or gpu is completely usseless and not have single advantage? I mean this for Amd cpu/gpu and not to be compared to intel cpu. I know for now amd only have sse2 in pcsx2 emulation and all of features of intel already got in pcsx2 emulation. It this make any sense to you my bositman?

[Gentleman]

The AMD sse 4.1a doesn't have the same intructions as intel sse 4.1. Bositman is trying to tell you that the instructions in amd see 4.1a aren't useful for Pcsx2. Which means that there must not be anything worth in sse4.1a to bring it to pcsx2.

[rama]

It's a bit like this:
Intel has addition > nice, we can use that.
AMD has reciprocal square root of the constant 4 (lol) > totally useless.

[Register]

My question is to amd cpu not to intel cpu for advantage in features of amd cpu and so for gpu amd.

[Gentleman]

What question ?

[rama]

My question is to amd cpu not to intel cpu for advantage in features of amd cpu and so for gpu amd.

Sorry, this doesn't make any sense to me..

[Register]

Oh thanks rama for explanation.

[Gentleman]

.................. -.-

[Syberproxy]

HAHAHAHAHAH I can't understand it either. HAHHAHA