Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
will pcsx2 run fast
#1
will pcsx2 run fast on the following
Amd FX 6100 UNLOCKED 3.3 ghz
GIGABYTE GA-78LMT-S2PT
Nvidia Geforce GTX 560 1GB Gddr5
Transcend 4GB DDR3 1333 MHZ RAM
Cooler Master Thunder 500W
western digital 500 gb

thanks
Reply

Sponsored links

#2
http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-Sticky-Wi...y-computer
in short, your CPU will limit you in most intensive games.
Bulldozer architecture is unfortunately performing very badly when it comes to pcsx2 or gaming in general.
CPU : I7 2600K Oc'ed @ 4.2Ghz
Mobo : Intel P67 southbridge
GPU : NVIDIA Geforce GTX 750 Ti
RAM : 6 Go
Reply
#3
i want to try games like dbz bt3, smackdown vs raw, budokai 3, burnout 3 and some other games
Reply
#4
(05-03-2013, 04:23 PM)anish Wrote: will pcsx2 run fast on the following
Amd FX 6100 UNLOCKED 3.3 ghz
GIGABYTE GA-78LMT-S2PT
Nvidia Geforce GTX 560 1GB Gddr5
Transcend 4GB DDR3 1333 MHZ RAM
Cooler Master Thunder 500W
western digital 500 gb

thanks

You should consider a bit of OC. I played GT4 with and FX-6100@4GHz + speedhack (EE: 2, VU: 1, other speedhack active) and it went well (except dark tracks, but those are quite buggy), and GT4 is said to be quite an intensive game...
FX-6300@4.4GHz | Noctua NH-U9B SE2| Asrock 990FX Extreme3| Sapphire HD7850 2GB| 2*4GB AMD Performance Memory 1600MHz Cas8| Intel X-18M 80GB G1| Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB| WD Caviar Green 2TB| Samsung S24B300 (LG Flatron L1720P)| Antec Three Hundred| Gigabyte GT-E8000| OCZ StealthXStream 2 600W| Gigabyte GM-M6800
Reply
#5
getting a piledriver cpu is a good buy due to 20 percent gain at same clock.
OS: Linux Mint 17.2 64 bit (occasional Antergos/Arch user)
(I am no longer a Windows user)
CPU: Intel Pentium G3258
GPU: Nvidia GTX 650 Ti



Reply
#6
(05-03-2013, 07:38 PM)DaTankAC Wrote: getting a piledriver cpu is a good buy due to 20 percent gain at same clock.

how about buying an Ivy bridge 70% more performance for the same clock Tongue like the 20% would matter that much Laugh
Reply
#7
plus the higher price for the cpu and upper level chipset. i have yet to find any game my fx4300 cant handle at 4.3 ghz.
OS: Linux Mint 17.2 64 bit (occasional Antergos/Arch user)
(I am no longer a Windows user)
CPU: Intel Pentium G3258
GPU: Nvidia GTX 650 Ti



Reply
#8
(05-03-2013, 09:12 PM)DaTankAC Wrote: plus the higher price for the cpu and upper level chipset. i have yet to find any game my fx4300 cant handle at 4.3 ghz.

Oh please don't you turn this to a fanboy thread we all know that bulldozer is the worse CPU to buy for emulation and that 20% increase wont cut it ;/
Reply
#9
(05-03-2013, 08:57 PM)The Old Refuge Wrote: how about buying an Ivy bridge 70% more performance for the same clock Tongue like the 20% would matter that much Laugh

70%?!?!?

I must repeat myself...

70%?!?!?


Where the hell did that value come from?!?!?!

Just take a look here
FX-6300@4.8GHz 70FPS
i5-3570k@4.8GHz 95FPS
It's a 35% difference.

FX-6100@4.8GHz 62FPS
i5-3570k@4.8GHz 95FPS
It's a 50% difference.
FX-6300@4.4GHz | Noctua NH-U9B SE2| Asrock 990FX Extreme3| Sapphire HD7850 2GB| 2*4GB AMD Performance Memory 1600MHz Cas8| Intel X-18M 80GB G1| Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB| WD Caviar Green 2TB| Samsung S24B300 (LG Flatron L1720P)| Antec Three Hundred| Gigabyte GT-E8000| OCZ StealthXStream 2 600W| Gigabyte GM-M6800
Reply
#10
(05-03-2013, 09:23 PM)||dav1de|| Wrote: 70%?!?!?

I must repeat myself...

70%?!?!?


Where the hell did that value come from?!?!?!

Just take a look here
FX-6300@4.8GHz 70FPS
i5-3570k@4.8GHz 95FPS
It's a 35% difference.

FX-6100@4.8GHz 62FPS
i5-3570k@4.8GHz 95FPS
It's a 50% difference.
ok i maybe a bit exaggerated
like the piledrive also have 20% increase in PCSX2 like Ivy barely got like 5-10% increase ! over SB
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)