..:: PCSX2 Forums ::..

Its ok,give us a hug! Hah jk
Well i cant afford much of the consoles so im going around the exprnsive way

well this Java made emulator is preety fine but speedwise this is just a bit too slow the C version PCSP is better although not as updated as this one I mean Playin puzzle buble pocket on both them and clearly you will know the winner when it comes to speed [like 35fps vs 80fps] but the PCSP does not have any sound and save yet

(06-26-2010 06:13 PM)anito9999 Wrote: [ -> ]well this Java made emulator is preety fine but speedwise this is just a bit too slow the C version PCSP is better although not as updated as this one I mean Playin puzzle buble pocket on both them and clearly you will know the winner when it comes to speed [like 35fps vs 80fps] but the PCSP does not have any sound and save yet

i can't understand why did they choose the slowest language for an emulator??????!!!!!!

if, the answer is...
jpcsp dev team:-"because it was easier in the beginning,"
than please leave the java project and continue the pcsp

(06-26-2010 07:37 PM)mcv Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-26-2010 06:13 PM)anito9999 Wrote: [ -> ]well this Java made emulator is preety fine but speedwise this is just a bit too slow the C version PCSP is better although not as updated as this one I mean Playin puzzle buble pocket on both them and clearly you will know the winner when it comes to speed [like 35fps vs 80fps] but the PCSP does not have any sound and save yet

i can't understand why did they choose the slowest language for an emulator??????!!!!!!

if, the answer is...
jpcsp dev team:-"because it was easier in the beginning,"
than please leave the java project and continue the pcsp

yes, i agree with you

i red somewhere before this time they need more testers,

so, if we want, we can help them a little bit

http://code.google.com/p/pcsp/

today appeared on the emucr a new build

take a look
http://www.emucr.com/2010/06/pcsp-udb-v2.html

I bet they choose java for the challenge.
Anyway, if the pace on JPCSP continues, then it won't matter what language it's written in.
It'll prolly be fast enough one day.

Btw, the C port is faster because it's missing features. No sound = no media engine processor, I believe

(06-27-2010 02:30 PM)rama Wrote: [ -> ]I bet they choose java for the challenge.
Anyway, if the pace on JPCSP continues, then it won't matter what language it's written in.
It'll prolly be fast enough one day.

Btw, the C port is faster because it's missing features. No sound = no media engine processor, I believe

actually on newest screenshots and test they have conducted they have finally managed to add sound in a few games and yet the FPS is still more than full speed compare to the Slug java counterpart that wont even get past 40fps on the same sets of game's and they have not released anything yet that last one was just a Frontend for Pcsp but I think I read back at thier forums that they are closing in the release of a new beta

PS: actually Super fruit fall is fully playable and is on Full speed and sound/save capable based on a test a friend of mine did on his PC it actually played very well in his non OC'ed E2200 with 2g ram and 8500gt PC
and compared performance against the java Version and Yeah the PCSP wins without a doubt it barely even made it to 25fps on the java one

After yesterday a friend of mine got the emulator,hes got 3 games,he tried to run them on PSP
And niether of them worked all of them didnt start
"BOOT.BIN is incrypted,this can be decrypted only by a real PSP"
Hopefully this will be removed.Cuz some games are like that

anito9999:
I prepared a long reply to your apples and oranges comparison, but to heck with it.
You are doing FPS comparisons of 2 very early emulators, then base the poorer performance of JPCSP
solely on it being written in Java. That's just so wrong I won't bother anymore.

Cya again in 3 years when the emulator is better, and runs games at 300fps anyway

(06-28-2010 01:25 PM)rama Wrote: [ -> ]anito9999:
I prepared a long reply to your apples and oranges comparison, but to heck with it.
You are doing FPS comparisons of 2 very early emulators, then base the poorer performance of JPCSP
solely on it being written in Java. That's just so wrong I won't bother anymore.

Cya again in 3 years when the emulator is better, and runs games at 300fps anyway

Hope your right about that one RAMA I really Hope you are so that I could buy myself a use'd PHAT PSP[price between the slim and the Phat are so high that its almost double the price of a used Phat] and be legally playin the game's on my PC

the final fantasy dissida is now introable

keep up the good work guys