Posts: 563
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
0
(06-27-2009, 09:52 PM)Geckoz3 Wrote: (06-27-2009, 09:24 PM)rama Wrote: You're limited by something else then. Don't ask me what it is though, could even be stuff like the AGP port (your computer still has this, right?).
no i have no agp slot, its all pci
I believe he means the actual GPU..
Or RAMA's slightly confused? Or I'm confused...
AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.6GHZ, 4GB PC8500 @ 1100MHZ, 4870x2 @ Stock.
Posts: 563
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
0
(06-27-2009, 11:31 PM)rama Wrote: I meant the graphic bus alright, no confusion there
In some early testing of mine I found the bus speed was important to GSdx..
Anyway, if speedhacks don't do anything, then something else is the bottleneck.
But whatever it is, fixing it will just shift the problem around a bit, making the cpu the bottleneck again.
The system is just too old.
I get ya
..
He could just overclock his PCI-E frequency? Although that's just a stupid idea..
Lol.
AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.6GHZ, 4GB PC8500 @ 1100MHZ, 4870x2 @ Stock.
Posts: 9
Threads: 3
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation:
0
06-29-2009, 12:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-29-2009, 12:20 AM by Lu5ck.)
Just running the emulator with everything off. Least "Services" and "Background", just to squeeze that bit of resources out. It can be quite significant if you didn't tweak your Windows XP at all.