Posts: 53
Threads: 4
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
05-29-2009, 11:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-30-2009, 02:33 PM by Alpha.)
First of all try PCSX2 official beta, beta plugins and latest gsdx revision.
If this won't help, you can try to overclock your cpu a little bit.
2,3 ghz is just not enough for pcsx2.
Asus M2N-E
Amd Phenom II X4 945 3000 MHz
Ati Radeon HD 4850 512MB
4 GB Ram
Posts: 349
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
0
05-30-2009, 01:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-30-2009, 01:08 AM by stpdrgstr.)
Your CPU is too slow for pcsx2. Try overclocking it, but you won't get much better speeds, at least not in Fate U/C. Menus run speedy as hell because they're just 2D.
Posts: 3
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
Your video card is probably more to blame than your CPU. I can't say anything for Phenom CPUs, but my 2.26Ghz Core 2 Duo (P8400) w/ GeForce 9800M GTS gives me full speed in WWE Smackdown Here Comes the Pain. PCSX2 is getting faster, not slower.
Posts: 135
Threads: 5
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
0
PCSX2 is much more CPU intensive then GPU intensive though.
Intel Core 2 Duo QX9750 Extreme Edition | eVGA 790i FTW | BFG GTX 280 OC 1GB | 8GB of Patriot Viper
Posts: 563
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
0
The Phenom's sucked compared to the C2D's.
A cheap intel C2D (Well.. it's classed as a C2D, though not an official one..) the E5200 will perform better than most, if not all first generation Phenom's.
AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.6GHZ, 4GB PC8500 @ 1100MHZ, 4870x2 @ Stock.
Posts: 830
Threads: 9
Joined: Jan 2009
(05-30-2009, 09:54 AM)Sythedragon Wrote: The Phenom's sucked compared to the C2D's.
A cheap intel C2D (Well.. it's classed as a C2D, though not an official one..) the E5200 will perform better than most, if not all first generation Phenom's.
Don't you get tired of posting stuff like "that sucked, this sucked, im so cool" without giving out any proof? This isn't a "whose processor's penis is bigger" board.
Posts: 135
Threads: 5
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
0
(05-30-2009, 11:17 AM)Cain Wrote: (05-30-2009, 09:54 AM)Sythedragon Wrote: The Phenom's sucked compared to the C2D's.
A cheap intel C2D (Well.. it's classed as a C2D, though not an official one..) the E5200 will perform better than most, if not all first generation Phenom's.
Don't you get tired of posting stuff like "that sucked, this sucked, im so cool" without giving out any proof? This isn't a "whose processor's penis is bigger" board.
Whatever you say Mr. i7 965
Haha, I kid, I kid.
Intel Core 2 Duo QX9750 Extreme Edition | eVGA 790i FTW | BFG GTX 280 OC 1GB | 8GB of Patriot Viper
Posts: 830
Threads: 9
Joined: Jan 2009
Well, I try to stay away from going around telling everyone their processor sucks
Posts: 563
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
0
(05-30-2009, 11:17 AM)Cain Wrote: (05-30-2009, 09:54 AM)Sythedragon Wrote: The Phenom's sucked compared to the C2D's.
A cheap intel C2D (Well.. it's classed as a C2D, though not an official one..) the E5200 will perform better than most, if not all first generation Phenom's.
Don't you get tired of posting stuff like "that sucked, this sucked, im so cool" without giving out any proof? This isn't a "whose processor's penis is bigger" board.
I never said it was.. But if you read up someone state's there not clear on Phenom performance, which to be nice wasn't good.. And they were out classed by cheap C2D's..
And I've never said "I'm so cool, and I've never went "My CPU R better than the OP's"
AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.6GHZ, 4GB PC8500 @ 1100MHZ, 4870x2 @ Stock.
