Multitap (PCSX2)
#41
Yay! Laugh

Now to await the rain of bug reports. Tongue

#EDIT: Wait a sec... no sio files commited? Sad
Those were in the pcsx2 directory inside the src_patch.zip file.
[Image: nbKSK.jpg]
Reply

Sponsored links

#42
Hmm.. oh... sio.h/cpp and sio_internal.h are not part of the patch. So I didn't include them. It seems a complete rewrite of some files...

Ref, did you go over those files? wanna commit them?
Reply
#43
The patch was only the memcard dialog and type check.

I worked on the rewrite on different files for quick switch between the old method. So I just copied them instead of replacing the originals for a patch file. Sorry.
[Image: nbKSK.jpg]
Reply
#44
Ill have a look when I get chance. Going to be busy all weekend Sad
[Image: ref-sig-anim.gif]

Reply
#45
Another build! So more work for ref. Tongue2

Moved a xor check away from the sio and into the memcard... plugin? as it makes more sense.
Command 81-26 looks cleaner now, with maybe a few less ops while at it.
[Image: nbKSK.jpg]
Reply
#46
Havent started yet, so thx Tongue2
[Image: ref-sig-anim.gif]

Reply
#47
Hmm.. I think I'll commit it anyway (v6), to gather some feedback from users, mostly to see if stuff got broken as a result. And if it gets reviewed and changes are required, we'll fix it later, or at the worst case, revert the patch.

I'll do that tomorrow.
Reply
#48
It can wait though, as I still wanna make the quicky check for memcards (auto-eject feature).
[Image: nbKSK.jpg]
Reply
#49
That would be nice, it's quite imperative that cards can eject and reload when a savestate is used.
[Image: ref-sig-anim.gif]

Reply
#50
Oh, on that case, post here when you want to commit it?

Also, how would PCSX2 behave with only the memcards patches applied (as it is now)? Should I revert it until the full patch? or is it mostly harmless? (seems mostly harmless to me)
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)