Posts: 86
Threads: 23
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
0
Location: São Paulo (BR) Brasil
05-02-2009, 05:31 AM
The pcsx2 you provide more support video card,
RADEON ATI or Nvidia GForce?
CPU: Athlon 64 +5600 @ 2.8
GPU: ATI PCS 4670 512MB 128Bits (PowerColor)
RAM: 3600Gbs DDR 800
HD: 500Gbs Sata
OS: Windows XP Serve Pack 3
OS2: Windows Vista Ultimate Serve Pack 2
Posts: 619
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
0
Nvidia, but only because Gabest doesn't have an ATI card to work with.
It's pretty much dead even, the rest of the system will matter much more than the brand. As long as you have two cards that are basically equivalent, it'll perform the same.
"This thread should be closed immediately, it causes parallel imagination and multiprocess hallucination" --ardhi
Posts: 86
Threads: 23
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
0
Location: São Paulo (BR) Brasil
joke!
Just Because I have an ATI!
CPU: Athlon 64 +5600 @ 2.8
GPU: ATI PCS 4670 512MB 128Bits (PowerColor)
RAM: 3600Gbs DDR 800
HD: 500Gbs Sata
OS: Windows XP Serve Pack 3
OS2: Windows Vista Ultimate Serve Pack 2
Posts: 162
Threads: 12
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
0
From what I understand ... why Gdsx for PCSX2 support more Nvidia rather than ATI (Note: I'm ATI user HD 4800 Series). The chipset for ATI is Under AMD. This plugin is more Programming toward Nvidia Driver and chipset rather than ATI. Thus We will see some different between this two cards but the problem is not to vary.
Posts: 20.261
Threads: 405
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
548
Location: England
its programmed towards neither, as far as im aware it has no brand specific optimizations in there, else each new card might make that optimization obsolete anyway. the only difference i know is on ATi's it has problem stretching the image, but thats probably down to poor ATi drivers.