Never called you an idiot, except if you mean squall's post.
Complain to the mybb group, not me.
Wasn't intentional. I'll just remove it.
I am aiming for cross-browser compatibility and IE compat up to IE7. If you have anything to propose, I'm all ears. No I am not using a ***** of plugins and yes to have lightbox, you actually need to...include it?
I'm aware of that and will look into it when I've got nothing more important to do. IMO this is pretty minor, the unused CSS is about 60 KB (OMG!!111). Old site had much more redundant stuff loading, but I guess you didn't want to ***** then for some reason.
It's valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional (if you disregard the CSS3 errors which are because of the social share buttons). But I guess you only want to flame so you 'missed' that.
I see you also 'missed' the statistics I posted proving that you are indeed a minority and that most people very much prefer this new design from the old one. Would be nice if you stopped flaming and tried to actually help.
Never said I was an expert. Keep up that attitude, then wonder why people ignore you or call you an idiot
bmate, nice work there. Although you are missing the stuff the left side menu has, and it looks just like the old design. The point was a different design and change seems to bug some people (although never thought it could cause this kind of hating levels).
I agree on the logos, but if you remember, there was a competition held for the program and icon (which was also used as a favicon later), That's why we aren't changing these. Also a bios rods favicon would be pretty much non - discernible.
I really can't understand all this hate against joomla, or having to modify the crap out of it. It's as fast as the old site, has much better functionality and better cross-browser compatibility. If you don't like the design, tough luck, many people hated the old design as well and were told the same. We can't appease everyone. Posting your opinion is very much welcome (and as you've seen, we do take it into account) but calling a design junk because you don't like it is a very different thing.
Quote:The forum has a age mismatch, it allows to enter until the registration page under certain age and then prompts you to change it because doesn't meet the allowed range.
Complain to the mybb group, not me.
Quote:And for your info, "Courier News" isn't even a font. Good job hiding the Fast, flexible and powerful T3 framework with css instead of removing it.
Wasn't intentional. I'll just remove it.
Quote:It's better use proprietary CSS3 prefixes for everything, so it looks round and require two independent JS frameworks with a ***** of plugins, including sexylightbox.
I am aiming for cross-browser compatibility and IE compat up to IE7. If you have anything to propose, I'm all ears. No I am not using a ***** of plugins and yes to have lightbox, you actually need to...include it?
Quote:And call me idiot again, but 61% (1254 rules!) of the CSS downloaded isn't even used. So, keep boasting about minification.
I'm aware of that and will look into it when I've got nothing more important to do. IMO this is pretty minor, the unused CSS is about 60 KB (OMG!!111). Old site had much more redundant stuff loading, but I guess you didn't want to ***** then for some reason.
Quote:And that's just taking a quick peek, I don't even know where to start talking about that inconsistent behemoth that used to be called markup.
It's valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional (if you disregard the CSS3 errors which are because of the social share buttons). But I guess you only want to flame so you 'missed' that.
I see you also 'missed' the statistics I posted proving that you are indeed a minority and that most people very much prefer this new design from the old one. Would be nice if you stopped flaming and tried to actually help.
Quote:Keep up the good job, expert.
Never said I was an expert. Keep up that attitude, then wonder why people ignore you or call you an idiot
bmate, nice work there. Although you are missing the stuff the left side menu has, and it looks just like the old design. The point was a different design and change seems to bug some people (although never thought it could cause this kind of hating levels).
I agree on the logos, but if you remember, there was a competition held for the program and icon (which was also used as a favicon later), That's why we aren't changing these. Also a bios rods favicon would be pretty much non - discernible.
Quote:Once those are finalised the staff could find someone who is willing to design and create a homepage that isn't based on Joomla or at least modify the crap out of it. Maybe you could even hire someone. Just find a student who needs some extra cash.
I really can't understand all this hate against joomla, or having to modify the crap out of it. It's as fast as the old site, has much better functionality and better cross-browser compatibility. If you don't like the design, tough luck, many people hated the old design as well and were told the same. We can't appease everyone. Posting your opinion is very much welcome (and as you've seen, we do take it into account) but calling a design junk because you don't like it is a very different thing.