Poll on deciding Internal resolution title

[refraction]

Okay I think for now, it's best leave it in, maybe combine the scaling/native option, that doesn't need to be separate, but some people may still want to use the custom scaling.

[ssakash]

Yeah, looks like most of the people's still prefer custom resolutions though, I guess everyone agress for the integration for native resolution in the scaling drop down list. If anyone has more ideas, feel free to mention.

[refraction]

tbh custom resolution is even more of a pain than normal scaling, it makes calculations in gsdx even more difficult to get right.

[Akio]

Now it's settled that the option won't be removed from the UI. The next question is should we change how the custom resolutions settings display? We have the following options:

• Leave it as is (gray out the settings until the Custom option is selected).
  
• Hide the settings until the Custom option is selected and reserve the space.
  
• Hide the settings until the Custom option is selected and adjust the window size accordingly (dynamically add/remove the UI components).
  
• Display a pop-up window when the Custom option is selected. Edit Resolution button will also display next to the Scaling drop-down list when the option is selected.
  

[refraction]

the first option sounds the best to me. the 2nd and 3rd option are either a lot of work for little gain or just look weird/ugly, the last option doesn't sound very user friendly and you're just replacing 2 text boxes with a button which kinda defeats the point in removing it from the UI

[gregory]

completely out of the subject. On linux I combine AF option, because AF 1x is same as off.