Will a kind soul evaluate these specs and tell me if they're worth it?
#21
(05-06-2012, 02:25 PM)Bositman Wrote: I don't think you even need an after market cooler for 4 Ghz with the i5 2500k, considering you have decent air flow in your case. Intel burn test always makes your processor go like +15c of what any game/application would ever make it so I don't think that matters Tongue

Yeah I know, the burn test stresses more than anything... but when I was seeing 90C+ I was freaking out, so I put it back to stock for now just to be safe. I plan on getting an after market cooler in about 6 months time and getting a really decent OC of 4.5-4.7ghz. Biggrin
Reply

Sponsored links

#22
There's no reason not get an aftermarket cooler though. If you can afford a nice processor there's no reason not to shell out the extra 30 bucks for some decent cooling to make it last a little longer. But agree with everything else, my OC to 4ghz took almost no time. Needed a bump to the NB frequency to keep it stable, but that was all.
CPU: AMD Phenom X4 960T Black Edition @ 4.00 Ghz
RAM: 4GB (2X2GB) DDR3
GPU: Radeon HD 6870 (2GB)
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 / Archlinux

I also have a lot of fun LEDs in my case, which help me look like a pro l33t gamer, and also function as nightlights because I'm mortally afraid of the dark.
Reply
#23
(05-06-2012, 03:19 PM)micerau Wrote: Yeah I know, the burn test stresses more than anything... but when I was seeing 90C+ I was freaking out, so I put it back to stock for now just to be safe. I plan on getting an after market cooler in about 6 months time and getting a really decent OC of 4.5-4.7ghz. Biggrin

Are you just letting the Vcore run up as you OC...?
What is it at during stress?
I found I could under-volt mine down when @ 4.5Ghz.

One thing's for sure;
It'll run @ it's max Turbo frequency across all core without a problem,
even on stock cooling.

4.0Ghz hardly would seem far off at that point. Wink
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)