the speed of 651 is slower than 650
#1
First thanks jakes hard workSmile
I test them on FFX and fatal frame, the 651 is slower 1~3 fps than 650, so I guess there is something wrong in the code.
Core 2 Duo E5200 @ 2.5Ghz /ATI HD5770 /2GB RAM 800 @ 1066Mhz /Asus P5QL /Windows XP SP3
Reply

Sponsored links

#2
That is not meaning there is wrong code.
Probably it's only a more accurate code that makes the emu work a little slower.
Reply
#3
But pls see the notes:
Optimized VTLB's mappings for VU0/VU1. Seems like a pretty big speedup to me,
but my PC sucks too much on VU1-intensive games for me to be sure. Smile
Core 2 Duo E5200 @ 2.5Ghz /ATI HD5770 /2GB RAM 800 @ 1066Mhz /Asus P5QL /Windows XP SP3
Reply
#4
is 651 the newer beta of playground ? I only see 636 being the newest.
Reply
#5
Let's wait til Krakatos upload some of these new revisions Wink
Reply
#6
And you should test some more games.
Reading the OFFICAL GUIDE can answer 90% of your newbie questions
SEARCHING the forums can answer 90% of your advanced questions.
Reply
#7
(01-29-2009, 02:28 PM)Force88 Wrote: is 651 the newer beta of playground ? I only see 636 being the newest.

you can download the svn per tortoise svn and then compile it with visual studio 2008 yourself only an example
Chicken is not Vegan?

NO VEGAN DIET NO VEGAN POWERS!!!!

http://www.flixxy.com/my-blackberry-is-not-working.htm
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)