04-24-2010, 12:22 AM
(04-23-2010, 12:13 PM)Game Wrote: [ -> ]You can read here just how complicated PS2 is.
http://users.ece.gatech.edu/lanterma/mpg...ec_ps2.pdf
Cool, thanks for sharing.
(04-23-2010, 12:13 PM)Game Wrote: [ -> ]You can read here just how complicated PS2 is.
http://users.ece.gatech.edu/lanterma/mpg...ec_ps2.pdf
(04-23-2010, 09:46 PM)Zeydlitz Wrote: [ -> ]Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. x86 architecture is apostate in world of CPU's, it's considered as WEAK, energy consuming and multipurpose (yes, it's a penalty) solution. It's rather cheap for multipurpose. Note that share of x86 cpu's is minor on whole CPU's market. So modern game developers are migrated into consoles. And, compare nouvelle PS3 games with PC's -- PC's graphics are outdated. It's not strange, 7 PowerPC SIMD co-processors could do more calculation (very specific) that every intell CPU now.
(04-24-2010, 12:52 AM)Caparroz Wrote: [ -> ](04-23-2010, 09:46 PM)Zeydlitz Wrote: [ -> ]Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. x86 architecture is apostate in world of CPU's, it's considered as WEAK, energy consuming and multipurpose (yes, it's a penalty) solution. It's rather cheap for multipurpose. Note that share of x86 cpu's is minor on whole CPU's market. So modern game developers are migrated into consoles. And, compare nouvelle PS3 games with PC's -- PC's graphics are outdated. It's not strange, 7 PowerPC SIMD co-processors could do more calculation (very specific) that every intell CPU now.
You're absolutely right on everything you said about x86 but...
"And, compare nouvelle PS3 games with PC's -- PC's graphics are outdated" LOLWUT?!?
(04-24-2010, 02:54 AM)refraction Wrote: [ -> ]indeed, its said the new crysis 2 is "superior" on pc compared to the ps3/360, so i dont buy the pc as being inferior
(04-24-2010, 11:32 PM)Air Wrote: [ -> ]... sure, if you have an overclocked i7-930 and a GTX-480, or something (a mere $800 or so!). heh.
(04-26-2010, 01:22 AM)Air Wrote: [ -> ]The point is that we are then comparing a $250 (or less) machine to a $1200 (or more) machine (including mobo, ram, and dvd), and then somehow feeling accomplished that it matches (and possibly exceeds) the $250 machine's performance?
(04-22-2010, 10:48 PM)Bositman Wrote: [ -> ]Yes. Totally different actually. It's totally different from dual cores etc if that makes you feel better The whole x86 architecture.
http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-Why-is-PCSX2-slow