12-30-2010, 10:59 AM
Currently I have a core 2 duo e8400 (3.0 ghz), which works well for PCSX2, as I'm able to run almost all of the games I have fullspeed. But I'm about to buy a secondary PC for my wife, and I imagine I'm going to be using it a lot too so I would want it to be able to run PCSX2 like my current rig. However, a new e8400-based rig is way outside of her budget, much less an I3/5/7.
After shopping around, I saw an e5700 which is half of the price of an e8400. The e5700 is a 45nm wolfdale cpu that clocks in at 3.0 ghz, and contains all the extra instruction sets featured on the e8400. The only difference is that it only has a 2mb L2 cache, and it runs on an 800 mhz FSB (As opposed to the 6mb L2 cache and 1333 mhz on the e8400.)
Basically, will the e5700 be significantly slower than my e8400 (assuming that I use the same kind of hardware for the rest, vidcard, memory and all) or will the difference in speed be negligible?
If we're talking below 10fps difference it's going to be enough for me considering the savings and I imagine the e5700 is going to be less of an electricity hog.
(P.S. I'm not interested in overclocking either of the processors)
After shopping around, I saw an e5700 which is half of the price of an e8400. The e5700 is a 45nm wolfdale cpu that clocks in at 3.0 ghz, and contains all the extra instruction sets featured on the e8400. The only difference is that it only has a 2mb L2 cache, and it runs on an 800 mhz FSB (As opposed to the 6mb L2 cache and 1333 mhz on the e8400.)
Basically, will the e5700 be significantly slower than my e8400 (assuming that I use the same kind of hardware for the rest, vidcard, memory and all) or will the difference in speed be negligible?
If we're talking below 10fps difference it's going to be enough for me considering the savings and I imagine the e5700 is going to be less of an electricity hog.
(P.S. I'm not interested in overclocking either of the processors)