..:: PCSX2 Forums ::..

Full Version: which pcsx2 version is beter
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
my lap top spec

windows visita home premium
intel core 2 centrino duo T7200 (2.0ghz x2)
2x1 gb ram at 699 mhz
160 gb HDD at 5400 rpm
ATI radeon mobility X1700 512mb @ 400mhz

it runs at speed at final fantasy X
30 to 50 frames

i have the pcsx 0.9.4 and the pcsx playground
which version is beter?

What do these program use most GPU, CPU, or DVD?

(when i use ver 0.9.4 my core goes to 100 % usage, when i use playground its only 60 %)

what would you recomend to me so it runs at 60fps (invidia gtx 9800 ?)

thankyou
(01-08-2009, 05:18 AM)convictor Wrote: [ -> ]my lap top spec

windows visita home premium
intel core 2 centrino duo T7200 (2.0ghz x2)
2x1 gb ram at 699 mhz
160 gb HDD at 5400 rpm
ATI radeon mobility X1700 512mb @ 400mhz

it runs at speed at final fantasy X
30 to 50 frames

i have the pcsx 0.9.4 and the pcsx playground
which version is beter?

What do these program use most GPU, CPU, or DVD?

(when i use ver 0.9.4 my core goes to 100 % usage, when i use playground its only 60 %)

what would you recomend to me so it runs at 60fps (invidia gtx 9800 ?)

thankyou


As FFX is more CPU dependant, your cpu's a bit weak to run it @60fps.
Anyway what you should do is use gdsx as gfx plugin and set the internal res to native. This could help

pcsx2 uses cpu/gpu, but trying to run your game from the DVD will result in bad fps anyway. (It's far better to make an iso)

About the best version : try with PP version once you've tried with 0.9.4.

thus you can make various tests with speedhacks to improve performances.
i am goin to get alchol 120 so make some iso now thanks for the help =)
(01-08-2009, 08:52 PM)convictor Wrote: [ -> ]i am goin to get alchol 120 so make some iso now thanks for the help =)

Use ImgBurn to make ISO's, it's better and free.
i would say pcsx2 vo.9.5 all the beta and the official build are the best....!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I would hope more pcsx2 betas and the official build would be alot better then what it was.
Nah, i think only official playground is best but beta after beta become going to worst. I dont have a clue, what is playground destination? What is playground main concept?. Just Seems like delete old code *good* than give new code *bug* or clean this and that without proper explanation "why is that necessary or urgent" all of those in my opinion like we just make complete new one and must leave with old one.
Nah, i think only official playground is best but beta after beta become going to worst. I dont have a clue, what is playground destination? What is playground main concept?. Just Seems like delete old code *good* than give new code *bug* or clean this and that without proper explanation "why is that necessary or urgent" all of those in my opinion like we just make complete new one and must leave with old one.
Nah, i think only official playground is best but beta after beta become going to worst. I dont have a clue, what is playground destination? What is playground main concept?. Just Seems like delete old code *good* than give new code *bug* or clean this and that without proper explanation "why is that necessary or urgent" all of those in my opinion like we just make complete new one and must leave with old one.
(01-08-2009, 05:18 AM)convictor Wrote: [ -> ]my lap top spec

windows visita home premium
intel core 2 centrino duo T7200 (2.0ghz x2)
2x1 gb ram at 699 mhz
160 gb HDD at 5400 rpm
ATI radeon mobility X1700 512mb @ 400mhz

NO. Your CPU runs at 2 ghz, the load is balanced between both cores so it runs faster than a single core. You don't have a 4 ghz cpu.
my pc setup:

widows xp
amd phenom II x4 945 (3.0 ghz)
2x2 GB ram
his radeon 5770 hd 1 gb (128bit) ddr5

what pcsx2 version you would recomend for my setup?