(02-23-2014, 02:26 PM)refraction Wrote: [ -> ]Don't compare PC gaming to emulators, they are 2 completely different kettles of fish, the comparison is complete nonsense.
If you have a dual graphics card system, make sure you select your better card in the GSDX config under "adapter" at the top.
This what i meant your first word. "The PCSX2 Engine" GSDX right? back in 2005 - 2007?
i am not asking okay so dont flame me. just asking
(02-23-2014, 02:29 PM)etking Wrote: [ -> ]Pcsx2 is really good, my two year old laptop (i72670qm + GT555M overclocked to 750/1000 and with voltage modded firmware) plays nearly all games fullspeed or close to fullspeed in 720p, and some in 1080p internal resolution. But it is also very far from perfect because there are many (mostly smaller) bugs in almost every game.
Usability could also be improved by including an OSD (to get feedback when pressing shortcut buttons), a cheat database / UI (like Dolphin) and the ability to use different settings per game without 3rd party tools which are a complicated mess to keep up to date between pcsx2 versions. Also xBR texture filters (like PPSSPP) would be nice to have.
To get a reasonable performance on older hardware you need to disable gimmicks like FXAA and shaders and use speedhacks like MTVU as well as async mix audio mode.
well thats an information maybe i am going to do some research to fixing my performance problem in some games and also "bug and crash".
(02-23-2014, 02:30 PM)Donovan24 Wrote: [ -> ]To answer your original question, the emulator is in a very good state.
Don't blame the emulator because your system is too weak to run it.
Dont blame the emulator? i am not blaming it srsly! why should i blame it when its the only one and the best PS 2 emulator? what i am asking was still far from perfect or is it good enough?
this is ps 2 cpu
CPU: Emotion Engine 300MHz, 128-bit INT, 128-bit FP, 24KB L1, 16KB Scratch, 8KB VU0, 32KB VU1, 450 MIPS, 6.2 GFLOPS, 66M Vertices/Sec, 2.4 GB/s Internal, 1.2 GB/s Graphics, 3.2 GB/s Memory
Graphics: Sony GS 150MHz, 1.2G Texels/Sec, 32-bit Color, 4MB (48 GB/s), 1.2 GB/sec Bus
Sound: SPU2, 48 2D Voices, ADPCM, 2MB
Data: 24MB (2.6 GB/s), 16MB (81 MB/s), 4.7GB Discs, Expansion 56K Modem Ethernet
This is the Average used Laptop on public :
2-3 Ghz~
4GB - 8GB RAM
2 - 4 GBVram
1366 x 768
AMD/ATI Nvidia
and heres sample from wiki
Quote:Hardware requirements are largely game-dependant although the performance bottleneck of this emulator in most cases is the CPU rather than the GPU: in short, having a computer with a faster CPU should net you better PCSX2 performance. Some games however may run slower due to unoptimized GFX code or weak GPU cards.
Newer CPUs generally perform better than older ones at similar clock speeds. High-end Intel processors are more efficient than the high-end AMD processors. The main reason for that is because Intel processors have higher performing floating-point units,[4][5] more cache and memory bandwidth, and lower latency.[6][7] Because PCSX2 only uses two main threads in hardware mode, having a CPU with more than two cores does not significantly increase PCSX2 performance.
wait did it just said "High-end Intel Processors are more efficient than the high-end processors"?
oh yeah i have some question does bios affect performance?