12-26-2015, 05:45 AM
12-26-2015, 05:59 AM
not bad for a quad-core 1.33GHz Intel Atom processor , didn't really get a good review about the Intel compute stick from my friends though.
12-26-2015, 06:39 AM
Once upon a time it required an E8400 to run FFX at 60 FPS.
12-26-2015, 03:07 PM
I bet if it wasn't sick you could get 60fps
12-26-2015, 03:16 PM
Ahhh.. Now i get it... I thought that was the brand name... I already was confused why intel calls this technology 'sick'...
12-30-2015, 06:02 PM
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core2-Duo-...tom-Z3735F
just going to leave this right here for reference
just going to leave this right here for reference
12-31-2015, 07:07 PM
those baytrail Atoms get fullspeed only in certain areas but it drops under fullspeed in most part of the game.
so expect like 25-40fps ish average depending on how much is rendered in the scene.
performance wise, but only if more than 2 cores are being used, they're equivalent to one of the first Athlon 64 X2s or Pentium Ds, not even Core2Duo.
The singlecore performance is horrible and similar to Pentium 4 or older ULV celerons.
At least they are quadcore and the GPU is DX11 capable. but thats about it.
I don't see a good future with pcsx2 on these kind of mobile CPUs if multithreading doesn't get further optimized that at least 4 cores are being used.
so expect like 25-40fps ish average depending on how much is rendered in the scene.
performance wise, but only if more than 2 cores are being used, they're equivalent to one of the first Athlon 64 X2s or Pentium Ds, not even Core2Duo.
The singlecore performance is horrible and similar to Pentium 4 or older ULV celerons.
At least they are quadcore and the GPU is DX11 capable. but thats about it.
I don't see a good future with pcsx2 on these kind of mobile CPUs if multithreading doesn't get further optimized that at least 4 cores are being used.