Posts: 1.288
Threads: 37
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
24
Location: Orlando, FL
Oh OK, gotcha. Feel free to delete these as well then.
Posts: 5.076
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
154
11-08-2015, 08:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2015, 08:10 PM by willkuer.)
Does anybody understand my point that a slider in the speedhacks sections shouldn't reduce speed or am I alone? (well.. @Ryudo Homies for life!)
Posts: 8.597
Threads: 105
Joined: May 2014
Reputation:
168
Location: 127.0.0.1
11-09-2015, 10:08 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2015, 05:02 PM by ssakash.)
The patch for invert is ready :
https://github.com/ssakash/pcsx2/commit/...d4de918109
I'll wait for the poll results till tomorrow and handle it according to the result, Thanks.
Quote:Does anybody understand my point that a slider in the speedhacks sections shouldn't reduce speed or am I alone?
yeah, I agree with blyss on this one.
We're supposed to be working as a team, if we aren't helping and suggesting things to each other, we aren't working as a team.
- Refraction
Posts: 104
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
2
Location: Right behind you
I think it should stay the same to keep the pattern of go right for faster
Posts: 7.414
Threads: 66
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation:
122
Location: Germany
willkuer: I agree with you, and propose we split the current speedhack panel up into 2 new sections.
One will be for the traditional speedhacks; those that make the program run faster on weak pcs.
The new section will be for "enhancement hacks"; things like the CDVD speed hack and the new EE overclock will go there.
What do you guys think?
Posts: 104
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
2
Location: Right behind you
I don't really like the idea of two parts of the same function split into different sections