12-09-2015, 04:17 AM
(12-09-2015, 03:43 AM)JonyeGway Wrote: GPUs advance so fast it's typically best to just buy a midrange card and upgrade in like 2 years when they are twice as powerful.
The 980 Ti beats out both a Fury X and Titan X
2015: Which hardware is good enough?
|
12-09-2015, 04:17 AM
(12-09-2015, 03:43 AM)JonyeGway Wrote: GPUs advance so fast it's typically best to just buy a midrange card and upgrade in like 2 years when they are twice as powerful. The 980 Ti beats out both a Fury X and Titan X (12-03-2015, 12:03 AM)TheFirePlayer14540 Wrote: Hey everyone! I am new to the forums, but not to the emulator. Im using an AMD RADEON R9 FURY X i was using a intergrated amd hd 3000 loll so yea going to a fury x i can run virtualy everygame maxxed,, although i cant run fatal frame 3 with 6x resolution and 16x anti ailising i get around 40-60fps (12-09-2015, 04:19 AM)h412v3y Wrote: Im using an AMD RADEON R9 FURY X IM HOPING THEY WILL FIX THAT AS MY GPU OR CPU ARE HOVERING AROUND 50% LOAD (12-08-2015, 02:29 AM)JonyeGway Wrote: With the amount you're looking on spending for peripherals you could get a GTX 980ti and play everything at max settings for a few years instead. I would recommend asking for/looking at other parts lists on the pcpartpicker forums and really maximize what you're getting for your money. And your first 2 builds you listed both have mismatching RAM modules and most likely wont even boot. gtx 980 titanium wont max it (12-08-2015, 06:57 PM)TheFirePlayer14540 Wrote: The hardware MUST match with the CPU, power supply and CPU fan!!!! hardware mode on pcsx2 uses virtualy no cpu.. its all gpu (12-09-2015, 03:31 AM)JonyeGway Wrote: For pcsx2 we recommend Nvidia graphics cards because they have better OpenGL performance in the emulator than similar priced AMD cards. A GTX 980ti would probably be the best GPU for pcsx2, but is way overkill and and a GTX 960 would perform very similarly. The 980ti is meant to max out PC games at like 1440p whereas the 960 will play most games at high settings in 1080p. no amd are better for open gl and open cl i was reeding up somewherre about open gl being an amd thing (12-09-2015, 04:17 AM)Nobbs66 Wrote: The 980 Ti beats out both a Fury X and Titan X fury x crushes the titan x and 980ti in dx12,, fp8 and fp32 32bit texture benchmarks and 8bit texxture benches it also has asyncHRONOUS compute so dx12 games will hevily rely on that,, also with dx12 the more cores u have,,the more fps u will get also u can crossfire an amd card with nvidia the fastest now is the fury x+ 980 titanium with the fury x in the first slot and plugging in the screens into it fury x2 is out this month... 1TB/S memory bandwidth 8196BIT Quote:hardware mode on pcsx2 uses virtualy no cpu.. You lost all credibility to your posts when you said this. PCSX2 relies 100x more on your CPU than on your GPU. There's only a few games that are actually heavy on the GPU. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 @ 3.60~4.20 GHz | Corsair Vengeance LPX 32 GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Super @ 6 GB | Samsung 980 1TB | Windows 10 Pro x64 (22H2)
12-09-2015, 05:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-09-2015, 05:05 AM by Blyss Sarania.)
(12-09-2015, 04:46 AM)h412v3y Wrote: i was reeding up somewherre about open gl being an amd thing And this. Ryudo Wrote:You lost all credibility to your posts when you said this. Gaming Rig: Intel i7 6700k @ 4.8Ghz | GTX 1070 TI | 32GB RAM | 960GB(480GB+480GB RAID0) SSD | 2x 1TB HDD
12-09-2015, 05:06 AM
Lol I actually missed that part about the OpenGL being an AMD thing...
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 @ 3.60~4.20 GHz | Corsair Vengeance LPX 32 GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Super @ 6 GB | Samsung 980 1TB | Windows 10 Pro x64 (22H2)
12-09-2015, 05:19 AM
12-09-2015, 05:20 AM
Gaming Rig: Intel i7 6700k @ 4.8Ghz | GTX 1070 TI | 32GB RAM | 960GB(480GB+480GB RAID0) SSD | 2x 1TB HDD |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|