User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 85 Vote(s) - 4.47 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GSdx
Author Message
zero29 Offline
Forum Weirdo
****

Posts: 919
Joined: May 2009
Location: Germany
Reputation: 3
Post: #1461
RE: GSdx
well, the difference on my system between the 13xx and 14xx revisions is over 33% (51->33), seems that my ati doesn't like some of your improvements Wink but i have to add, that ffx seems to be the exception. many other games run at equal or higher fps with later gsdx revsions.

another thing: the last revision seems to break the intro fmv of ff12 completely (software mode works), regardless of the "allow 8-bit textures" option or chosen internal resolution, the game itself seems to run fine though:

(r1538/r1549/r1549 .gs)


Attached File(s) Thumbnail(s)
       

.7z  gsdx_20090722143408.7z (Size: 762,98 KB / Downloads: 284)

CPU Core i5-3570K@3.4GHz | GPU Nvidia Geforce GTX 570 | RAM 8GB DDR-3 1600MHz CL9 | OS Win7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
EMU PCSX2 v1.1.0 r5645 | GS GSdx SSE4 r5632 | SPU2 SPU2-X r5559 | PAD LilyPad r5403 | CDVD cdvdGigaherz r5403
(This post was last modified: 07-22-2009 02:51 PM by zero29.)
07-22-2009 02:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Sponsored links

snkmad Offline
Newbie

Posts: 14
Joined: Dec 2008
Location:
Reputation: 0
Post: #1462
RE: GSdx
Well just tried rev1551, with gsdx9.
Im using a E5200@2.5Ghz and a GMA 3100 on Win7.

I tried running the Bios, and got and error saying pcsx2 encoutered and error and would close. The output was this:
Code:
Bios Version 2.0
Framelimiter rate updated (UpdateVSyncRate): 59.94 fps
MTGS > Thread Started, Opening GS Plugin...
MTGS > GSopen Finished, return code: 0xffffffff

Using rev1474, pcsx2 wouldnt crash, it would run, but only with a black screen, and the console output would be this:
Code:
Bios Version 2.0
Framelimiter rate updated (UpdateVSyncRate): 59.94 fps
MTGS > Thread Started, Opening GS Plugin...
D:\Emu\Pcsx2-r1474\memory(169,53): error X4502: invalid ps_2_0 input semantic 'VPOS'

D:\Emu\Pcsx2-r1474\memory(177,53): error X4502: invalid ps_2_0 input semantic 'VPOS'

MTGS > GSopen Finished, return code: 0x0
No accelerated IMDCT transform found
Boot Error > SYSTEM.CNF not found
XML Loader returned an error. Trying to load a pnach...
No patch found.Resuming execution without a patch (this is NOT an error).
patchnumber: 0
Boot Error > SYSTEM.CNF not found
Issuing EE/iR5900-32 Recompiler Reset [mem/structure cleanup]
Running the PS2 BIOS...
Boot Error > SYSTEM.CNF not found
XML Loader returned an error. Trying to load a pnach...
No patch found.Resuming execution without a patch (this is NOT an error).
patchnumber: 0
# Initialize memory (rev:3.70, ctm:393Mhz, cpuclk:295Mhz detected)
# Total accessable memory size: 32 MB (B:2:8:0) (370:2:7c30)
# TLB spad=0 kernel=1:12 default=13:30 extended=31:38
# Initialize Start.
PAL Display Mode Initialized.
Framelimiter rate updated (UpdateVSyncRate): 50.0 fps
# Initialize GS ...
# Initialize INTC ...
# Initialize TIMER ...
# Initialize DMAC ...
# Initialize VU1 ...
# Initialize VIF1 ...
# Initialize GIF ...
# Initialize VU0 ...
# Initialize VIF0 ...
# Initialize IPU ...
# Initialize FPU ...
# Initialize User Memory ...
# Initialize Scratch Pad ...
# Initialize Done.

EE DECI2 Manager version 0.06 Feb  6 2003 08:38:48
  CPUID=2e20, BoardID=0, ROMGEN=2004-0614, 32M

# Restart Without Memory Clear.
NTSC Display Mode Initialized.
Framelimiter rate updated (UpdateVSyncRate): 59.94 fps
PAL Display Mode Initialized.
Framelimiter rate updated (UpdateVSyncRate): 50.0 fps
# Initialize GS ...
# Initialize INTC ...
# Initialize TIMER ...
# Initialize DMAC ...
# Initialize VU1 ...
# Initialize VIF1 ...
# Initialize GIF ...
# Initialize VU0 ...
# Initialize VIF0 ...
# Initialize IPU ...
# Initialize FPU ...
# Initialize Scratch Pad ...
# Restart Without Memory Clear Done.
# Restart Without Memory Clear.
NTSC Display Mode Initialized.
Framelimiter rate updated (UpdateVSyncRate): 59.94 fps
PAL Display Mode Initialized.
Framelimiter rate updated (UpdateVSyncRate): 50.0 fps
# Initialize GS ...
# Initialize INTC ...
# Initialize TIMER ...
# Initialize DMAC ...
# Initialize VU1 ...
# Initialize VIF1 ...
# Initialize GIF ...
# Initialize VU0 ...
# Initialize VIF0 ...
# Initialize IPU ...
# Initialize FPU ...
# Initialize Scratch Pad ...
# Restart Without Memory Clear Done.
REGION PARAMS = Oceania EEengEE


Attached File(s) Thumbnail(s)
   
(This post was last modified: 07-22-2009 03:35 PM by snkmad.)
07-22-2009 03:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dr.J Offline
Member
**

Posts: 60
Joined: Dec 2008
Location:
Reputation: 0
Post: #1463
RE: GSdx
(07-22-2009 02:48 PM)zero29 Wrote:  well, the difference on my system between the 13xx and 14xx revisions is over 33% (51->33), seems that my ati doesn't like some of your improvements Wink but i have to add, that ffx seems to be the exception. many other games run at equal or higher fps with later gsdx revsions.

ATI problem was reintroduced in r1439. None of the following commits fixed that. In some games there is more than 200% difference. "8 bit textures" never worked well on ATI. All games I've tested with it runs on very low fps. It's impossible to play almost all games on ATI now.
07-22-2009 04:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CentroX Offline
Member
**

Posts: 60
Joined: May 2009
Location:
Reputation: 0
Post: #1464
RE: GSdx
I am a glad I have an nvidia card
07-22-2009 06:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
zero29 Offline
Forum Weirdo
****

Posts: 919
Joined: May 2009
Location: Germany
Reputation: 3
Post: #1465
RE: GSdx
(07-22-2009 04:27 PM)Dr.J Wrote:  ATI problem was reintroduced in r1439. None of the following commits fixed that. In some games there is more than 200% difference. "8 bit textures" never worked well on ATI. All games I've tested with it runs on very low fps. It's impossible to play almost all games on ATI now.

now that's a bit harsh, dq8 e.g. is ca. 15% (50 vs. 43) slower on newer revisions, mgs3 almost exactly the same (60 vs. 60), gow1 seems to even gain some fps (45 vs. 48) with the later revisions on my system (all@1600x1200, no speed hacks). it's definitely not the case that gsdx is currently unusable for owners of ati cards, but of course, it would be great if the reason(s) for the fps differences between r1398 and r1439 could be found and fixed Wink

CPU Core i5-3570K@3.4GHz | GPU Nvidia Geforce GTX 570 | RAM 8GB DDR-3 1600MHz CL9 | OS Win7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
EMU PCSX2 v1.1.0 r5645 | GS GSdx SSE4 r5632 | SPU2 SPU2-X r5559 | PAD LilyPad r5403 | CDVD cdvdGigaherz r5403
07-22-2009 07:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dr.J Offline
Member
**

Posts: 60
Joined: Dec 2008
Location:
Reputation: 0
Post: #1466
RE: GSdx
(07-22-2009 07:27 PM)zero29 Wrote:  now that's a bit harsh, dq8 e.g. is ca. 15% (50 vs. 43) slower on newer revisions, mgs3 almost exactly the same (60 vs. 60)

I have HD4850 and for me it's absolutlely unusable.
MGS3 slowed down from 80+ to 30 fps
I was able to run Jak and Daxter in 1680x1680 fullspeed with absolutely no problem, but now it's hard to reach even 40 fps in native!
GoW 1 and 2 was never gpu-limited for me.

P.S. Please tell me you aren't talking about DX10 mode! feal87 suggested a fix, wich made DX9 a lot... I mean A LOT faster than dx10. At least for ATI. r1439 ruined this optimization.
(This post was last modified: 07-22-2009 08:49 PM by Dr.J.)
07-22-2009 08:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Karas Offline
Newbie

Posts: 22
Joined: May 2009
Location:
Reputation: 0
Post: #1467
RE: GSdx
(07-22-2009 08:32 PM)Dr.J Wrote:  
(07-22-2009 07:27 PM)zero29 Wrote:  now that's a bit harsh, dq8 e.g. is ca. 15% (50 vs. 43) slower on newer revisions, mgs3 almost exactly the same (60 vs. 60)

I have HD4850 and for me it's absolutlely unusable.
MGS3 slowed down from 80+ to 30 fps
I was able to run Jak and Daxter in 1680x1680 fullspeed with absolutely no problem, but now it's hard to reach even 40 fps in native!
GoW 1 and 2 was never gpu-limited for me.

P.S. Please tell me you aren't talking about DX10 mode! feal87 suggested a fix, wich made DX9 a lot... I mean A LOT faster than dx10. At least for ATI. r1439 ruined this optimization.

I just tested r1398 vs, r1551 both in X10 and X9 mode, same settings.
FF-XII NTSC no difference at all, 107FPS - 112FPS
Kingdom Hearts 2, no difference 145FPS X9 on both and 120FPS X10 on both

2600K @ 4.5ghz | Asus P8Z68 Deluxe/Gen3 | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 580 | X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | x2 60Gb Solid 3 SSD | 64GB Samsung 830 SSD | WD Black 1T / Hitachi 2T HDD
Antec P-182 Case | Antec Kuhler 920 Water Cooler | Samsung 2233z 3D Monitor | Samsung 46C7000 3Dtv | Win7 x64 Ultimate
(This post was last modified: 07-22-2009 09:11 PM by Karas.)
07-22-2009 09:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dr.J Offline
Member
**

Posts: 60
Joined: Dec 2008
Location:
Reputation: 0
Post: #1468
RE: GSdx
Wrong choice for testing.
07-22-2009 09:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Karas Offline
Newbie

Posts: 22
Joined: May 2009
Location:
Reputation: 0
Post: #1469
RE: GSdx
(07-22-2009 09:40 PM)Dr.J Wrote:  Wrong choice for testing.


What do you recommend to test?

I have hundreds of games

2600K @ 4.5ghz | Asus P8Z68 Deluxe/Gen3 | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 580 | X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | x2 60Gb Solid 3 SSD | 64GB Samsung 830 SSD | WD Black 1T / Hitachi 2T HDD
Antec P-182 Case | Antec Kuhler 920 Water Cooler | Samsung 2233z 3D Monitor | Samsung 46C7000 3Dtv | Win7 x64 Ultimate
07-22-2009 10:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
zero29 Offline
Forum Weirdo
****

Posts: 919
Joined: May 2009
Location: Germany
Reputation: 3
Post: #1470
RE: GSdx
(07-22-2009 09:40 PM)Dr.J Wrote:  Wrong choice for testing.

well, that's easy to say. if you don't like our results, you just claim that we tested the wrong games. what about benchmarking your system with the .gs shot of this post so that we have some comparison values? or you could provide some .gs files yourself, which show huge differences between dx9 and dx10 or between r1398 and r1439 on your system, what about that?

(07-22-2009 10:02 PM)Karas Wrote:  What do you recommend to test?

I have hundreds of games

you know, i was about to ask the same question, but i'm getting the impression that this discussion tends to focus more and more on myths than on facts. which helps neither gabest nor us.

CPU Core i5-3570K@3.4GHz | GPU Nvidia Geforce GTX 570 | RAM 8GB DDR-3 1600MHz CL9 | OS Win7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
EMU PCSX2 v1.1.0 r5645 | GS GSdx SSE4 r5632 | SPU2 SPU2-X r5559 | PAD LilyPad r5403 | CDVD cdvdGigaherz r5403
07-22-2009 10:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 





Current time: 11-23-2014, 11:38 AM