Naruto Ultimate Ninja 5 (PAL) graphics issues and slowness
#11
Untick native and use this 1024x768
Core i3 9100f 3.6Ghz
RAM=8GB
nvidia GT 1030
pcsx2 version-1.3.1  
Reply

Sponsored links

#12
(11-24-2013, 05:12 PM)Brock lessner Wrote: Untick native and use this 1024x768
Well, uh, it definitely looks better, although blurry, but I still sometimes get screen glitches, such as a really quick screen spazzing where it just goes crazy really quickly.
edit: Yep.. Sometimes I also get the screen moving all the way to the right in for example loading screens..
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bits (6.1, build 7601)
Processor: AMD A8-3800 APU with Radeon™ HD Graphics (4 CPUs), ~ 2.4 GHz
RAM: 4096MB = 4.1 GB
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Reply
#13
Press f5 then
Core i3 9100f 3.6Ghz
RAM=8GB
nvidia GT 1030
pcsx2 version-1.3.1  
Reply
#14
(11-24-2013, 05:25 PM)Brock lessner Wrote: Press f5 then
Doesn't that change the interlacing? Mine was on auto. Hm.. I'm now testing on 1920x1080 with the DirectX9 version of GSDx and so far it's good. If it starts to go weird again I'll try to mess around with the interlacing.
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bits (6.1, build 7601)
Processor: AMD A8-3800 APU with Radeon™ HD Graphics (4 CPUs), ~ 2.4 GHz
RAM: 4096MB = 4.1 GB
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Reply
#15
(11-24-2013, 05:32 PM)Toby Wrote: Doesn't that change the interlacing? Mine was on auto. Hm.. I'm now testing on 1920x1080 with the DirectX9 version of GSDx and so far it's good. If it starts to go weird again I'll try to mess around with the interlacing.

definatly its change interlacing. As you mention your game screen shaking while loading so,in some games it fixed it.
Core i3 9100f 3.6Ghz
RAM=8GB
nvidia GT 1030
pcsx2 version-1.3.1  
Reply
#16
(11-24-2013, 05:19 PM)Toby Wrote: Well, uh, it definitely looks better, although blurry, but I still sometimes get screen glitches, such as a really quick screen spazzing where it just goes crazy really quickly.
edit: Yep.. Sometimes I also get the screen moving all the way to the right in for example loading screens..

This sounds more like the screen stretch issue with the new Nvidia drivers.
( http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-Graphics-...ia-drivers)

Try downgrading to 314.22 and use this settings:

All recommanded Speedhacks on + MTVU on, EE: 2, VU: 0
GSDX: DX11, MSAA off, 2x Native
Reply
#17
(11-24-2013, 05:36 PM)Brock lessner Wrote: definatly its change interlacing. As you mention your game screen shaking while loading so,in some games it fixed it.
Huh, nah, it's not the interlacing in this case.
(11-24-2013, 05:57 PM)Grove4L Wrote: This sounds more like the screen stretch issue with the new Nvidia drivers.
( http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-Graphics-...ia-drivers)

Try downgrading to 314.22 and use this settings:

All recommanded Speedhacks on + MTVU on, EE: 2, VU: 0
GSDX: DX11, MSAA off, 2x Native
I see.. Thanks, I guess. For now I'm fine with what I have since putting it on 1920x108 is not as problematic as any other resolutions I tried before, although there are minor graphics glitches but I don't really mind them.
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bits (6.1, build 7601)
Processor: AMD A8-3800 APU with Radeon™ HD Graphics (4 CPUs), ~ 2.4 GHz
RAM: 4096MB = 4.1 GB
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Reply
#18
(11-24-2013, 01:32 PM)Toby Wrote: It's enough for this game, since my GHz is clearly the same as of the link I posted where the person had full speed.

The CPU linked is an Intel CPU. They have very different architectures. Most AMD CPUs have to be overclocked over their Intel counterparts to get comparable performance.
Reply
#19
(11-25-2013, 12:29 AM)metalmallow Wrote: The CPU linked is an Intel CPU. They have very different architectures. Most AMD CPUs have to be overclocked over their Intel counterparts to get comparable performance.

Exactly.

Further reading: Megahertz myth
[Image: XTe1j6J.png]
Gaming Rig: Intel i7 6700k @ 4.8Ghz | GTX 1070 TI | 32GB RAM | 960GB(480GB+480GB RAID0) SSD | 2x 1TB HDD
Reply
#20
(11-25-2013, 12:29 AM)metalmallow Wrote: The CPU linked is an Intel CPU. They have very different architectures. Most AMD CPUs have to be overclocked over their Intel counterparts to get comparable performance.
Huh.. weird. Mine is unclockable, though..
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bits (6.1, build 7601)
Processor: AMD A8-3800 APU with Radeon™ HD Graphics (4 CPUs), ~ 2.4 GHz
RAM: 4096MB = 4.1 GB
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)