..:: PCSX2 Forums ::..

EE Clock Rate
<------------------------------------------>
Crap CPU Amazing CPU

You must use non breaking space to write something like that properly XD

Everybody believes his Pentium 4 OC @ 4.2GHz is awesome...

And now you removed the focus from my latest update... How dare you?

(11-11-2015, 08:30 PM)willkuer Wrote: [ -> ]-.-''

Code:

                   EE clock rate
       ≪-----------------------------≫
Faster             Accurate             Smoother
EE underclock                       EE overclock

I know which is which after I thought about it. But the fact that I had to think and I'm technologically inclined does not bode well.

---

(11-11-2015, 08:35 PM)willkuer Wrote: [ -> ]Everybody believes his Pentium 4 OC @ 4.2GHz is awesome...

This too.

This was actually a proposal. So a two-liner: first line for noobs and second for those who think too complicated and therefore need facts.

(11-11-2015, 08:36 PM)Blyss Sarania Wrote: [ -> ]I know which is which after I thought about it. But the fact that I had to think and I'm technologically inclined does not bode well.

---

This too.

This is the reason why we need revised requirements for 1.4.0.  If we don't people are going to continue to compare their hardware to the current requirements and have to be told that they're outdated.

(11-11-2015, 08:38 PM)willkuer Wrote: [ -> ]This was actually a proposal. So a two-liner: first line for noobs and second for those who think too complicated and therefore need facts.

I actually thought that at first but then I thought you were just explaining it.

As a proposal it works, I think assuming there is still some value of -2 +2 or % etc shown somewhere then it's fine.

(11-11-2015, 08:38 PM)Nobbs66 Wrote: [ -> ]This is the reason why we need revised requirements for 1.4.0.  If we don't people are going to continue to compare their hardware to the current requirements and have to be told that they're outdated.

Yes.

If I look into the code I think it is highly questionable that we can ever put something like a percentage next to it. It really depends on the game and scene how much overclock it really does.

Doesn't have to be a % just something to indicate the set point. What I'm speaking about is already there:

(11-11-2015, 08:22 PM)willkuer Wrote: [ -> ]Ref had a very nice idea. At least I think it is nice. Call it as you like and align it as you like but the two limits are not -2 and 2 or -50% or 50% but 'faster' and 'smoother'.

So maybe something like:

Code:

                  EE clock rate
       ≪-----------------------------≫
Faster             Accurate             Smoother

What do you think?

I think most users will be confused. They will think that 60 fps is smoother and faster than 40 fps.

(11-11-2015, 08:38 PM)willkuer Wrote: [ -> ]This was actually a proposal. So a two-liner: first line for noobs and second for those who think too complicated and therefore need facts.

I think the first line is for quick thinkers. Noobs will be stunned.