..:: PCSX2 Forums ::..

Full Version: Will PCSX2 run fast on my computer?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665
(07-29-2017, 06:35 PM)TkSilver Wrote: [ -> ]It depends on the processor more then the GPU, so no clue since that laptop can have a variety of different processors.

From how I thought you did not look up the computer name on google anyway it has an i7 7700hqWink
(07-30-2017, 06:05 PM)MatPower01 Wrote: [ -> ]From how I thought you did not look up the computer name on google anyway it has an i7 7700hqWink

I did google the computer's name msi's own site listed it as having a selection of processors.  Anyways for GT4 it should be a reasonably good experience as long as thermal throttling and power restrictions aee not an issue woth that specific laptop (being a MSI one I doubt it will have cooling issues).  Also the license tests should still be skipped (by cheating), not just because they are a pain sometimes but mainly because a Vram spike issue thst seems to occure arround them.

(07-30-2017, 03:13 PM)Hachiko Wrote: [ -> ]Suggestions?
Instead of i7 7500u(1900 STR) and 940mx which laptop can be good? GT 4, Midnight club 3, Burnout, etc(Well only racing games)

The best you can do in a laptop form factor, as far as pure performance goes, is a desktop CPU in a laptop and that has become a thing on some laptops.  The downsides are expense and size.  For a reasonable performance level the 7700hq or other hq processon (you can even get i5's in hq from skylake and kabylake).  The U line up has a few ok CPU's in it and if you really really have to have an ultrabook or small size then this is the best you are going to get in those sizes  (except at ridicilous prices) due to limited cooling room.

So laptops like that MSI maxpower01 mentioned or the Dell 7000 series would be my recomendations.
(07-30-2017, 07:01 PM)TkSilver Wrote: [ -> ]I did google the computer's name msi's own site listed it as having a selection of processors.  Anyways for GT4 it should be a reasonably good experience as long as thermal throttling and power restrictions aee not an issue woth that specific laptop (being a MSI one I doubt it will have cooling issues).  Also the license tests should still be skipped (by cheating), not just because they are a pain sometimes but mainly because a Vram spike issue thst seems to occure arround them.


The best you can do in a laptop form factor, as far as pure performance goes, is a desktop CPU in a laptop and that has become a thing on some laptops.  The downsides are expense and size.  For a reasonable performance level the 7700hq or other hq processon (you can even get i5's in hq from skylake and kabylake).  The U line up has a few ok CPU's in it and if you really really have to have an ultrabook or small size then this is the best you are going to get in those sizes  (except at ridicilous prices) due to limited cooling room.

So laptops like that MSI maxpower01 mentioned or the Dell 7000 series would be my recomendations.

These racing games need 1050ti for run full speed with native resolution?( I won't play 2x native...)

So For CPU intensive games you need 2000 STR and for GPU intensive games? Which gpus are good if count laptops?
Currently OpenGL is the backend with the most compatibility (besides software) and the most current work being done. For this reason I would recomend an Nvidia GPU because Nvidia's drivers tend to play better with OpenGL.

As long as you are not going high on the internal resolution or adding lots of AA AF or other enhancments then something around a gt730 to a gtx750ti should be fine for most games. Very specific games have odd issues that may change this (GT 4 has VRam spikes that crash things under specific situations), but this is more of a game by game basis and not a general thing.

Basically they don't need a 1050ti to run at full speed it is just that you tend to get certain classes of CPUs paired with certain GPU's and most of the time you don't see a 7700hq matched with a mx150 or mx940 or other lower end card. The mx150/gt1030 is a very interesting card if the mx card performs like the desktop 1030 then that puts it right in the same performance area as the gtx750 (non ti) which is a good place for emulation of a lot of systems.
(07-31-2017, 07:39 PM)TkSilver Wrote: [ -> ]Currently OpenGL is the backend with the most compatibility (besides software) and the most current work being done. For this reason I would recomend an Nvidia GPU because Nvidia's drivers tend to play better with OpenGL.

As long as you are not going high on the internal resolution or adding lots of AA AF or other enhancments then something around a gt730 to a gtx750ti should be fine for most games. Very specific games have odd issues that may change this (GT 4 has VRam spikes that crash things under specific situations), but this is more of a game by game basis and not a general thing.

Basically they don't need a 1050ti to run at full speed it is just that you tend to get certain classes of CPUs paired with certain GPU's and most of the time you don't see a 7700hq matched with a mx150 or mx940 or other lower end card. The mx150/gt1030 is a very interesting card if the mx card performs like the desktop 1030 then that puts it right in the same performance area as the gtx750 (non ti) which is a good place for emulation of a lot of systems.

This is the problem...7700hq with GTX 960 or 970 can be perfect for PC games that i want run and pcsx2 emulation Sad
If you have a Intel 6xxx processor , you can use the shipset Inside of it with no mush drop (but is limited in fxaa and other demanding options).
(07-31-2017, 07:39 PM)TkSilver Wrote: [ -> ]Currently OpenGL is the backend with the most compatibility (besides software) and the most current work being done. For this reason I would recomend an Nvidia GPU because Nvidia's drivers tend to play better with OpenGL.

As long as you are not going high on the internal resolution or adding lots of AA AF or other enhancments then something around a gt730 to a gtx750ti should be fine for most games. Very specific games have odd issues that may change this (GT 4 has VRam spikes that crash things under specific situations), but this is more of a game by game basis and not a general thing.

Basically they don't need a 1050ti to run at full speed it is just that you tend to get certain classes of CPUs paired with certain GPU's and most of the time you don't see a 7700hq matched with a mx150 or mx940 or other lower end card. The mx150/gt1030 is a very interesting card if the mx card performs like the desktop 1030 then that puts it right in the same performance area as the gtx750 (non ti) which is a good place for emulation of a lot of systems.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/MSI-GL62-7...646.0.html

Can you confirm that GTX 960M is enough for GPU intensive games?(Native resolution only so NOT 2x native)
it is enough and it's not either.
depends on the games you're trying to play.
If you don't go higher than native, the racing games you mentioned will be fine with that laptop
If you try Zoe2, your GPU will have a hard time.

there is no "magic config", nor "magic hardware"

Sorry
(07-31-2017, 08:16 PM)jesalvein Wrote: [ -> ]it is enough and it's not either.
depends on the games you're trying to play.
If you don't go higher than native, the racing games you mentioned will be fine with that laptop
If you try Zoe2, your GPU will have a hard time.

there is no "magic config", nor "magic hardware"

Sorry

You mean full speed?
Awesome then
(07-31-2017, 08:27 PM)Hachiko Wrote: [ -> ]You mean full speed?
Awesome then

no, I mean "fine"
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665