..:: PCSX2 Forums ::..

Full Version: Will PCSX2 run fast on my computer?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665
(04-07-2010, 08:15 AM)ilovejedd Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-07-2010, 08:02 AM)Bositman Wrote: [ -> ]Second option Tongue It's 3 cores working at 2,1 Ghz each, that does not count as 3x2,1.
Theoretically, if you've got an app that scales really well with multiple cores and doesn't suffer any penalty from threading, you could get work done thrice as fast as a single 2.1GHz core. Effectively, that makes it as fast as a single 6.3GHz CPU.

Alas, that's all theoretical. Sadly, reality is far from that.

Well, i'm studying that kind of thing. The codes that allow us to take advantage of multiple cores (more than 2 cores) and then combine them. Let's say virtual clock speed CPU. Say that a CPU has 4 cores. In this case, maybe in the future we can take advantage of those cores and divide them into 2 virtual cores (each virtual core consists of 2 cores). Well i said maybe and that doesn't mean it should or will happen at times like this.
Building a new Mini-PC. What do you guys think of the following?

SILVERSTONE Sugo SG05-B w/300W SFX PSU
DFI LANParty MI P55-T36 LGA-1156 P55 Mini-ITX or GIGABYTE GA-H55N-USB3
Intel Core i7-860 2.80GHz (originally planned on i5-750 but this was only $200 at MicroCenter)
COOLER MASTER Geminii S
XFX GT240XYHFC GeForce GT 240 512MB GDDR5 (wanted the HD5670 but I need CUDA)
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 CL9 1.5V KVR1333D3N9K2/4G
Kingston SSDNow V 40GB x2 RAID-0 (on-hand)

Would the GT 240 be a severe bottleneck for PCSX2? With the power supply, I'm afraid to go any higher and the unusual form factor means it can't be easily replaced.
(04-09-2010, 05:38 AM)ilovejedd Wrote: [ -> ]Building a new Mini-PC. What do you guys think of the following?

SILVERSTONE Sugo SG05-B w/300W SFX PSU
DFI LANParty MI P55-T36 LGA-1156 P55 Mini-ITX or GIGABYTE GA-H55N-USB3
Intel Core i7-860 2.80GHz (originally planned on i5-750 but this was only $200 at MicroCenter)
COOLER MASTER Geminii S
XFX GT240XYHFC GeForce GT 240 512MB GDDR5 (wanted the HD5670 but I need CUDA)
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 CL9 1.5V KVR1333D3N9K2/4G
Kingston SSDNow V 40GB x2 RAID-0 (on-hand)

Would the GT 240 be a severe bottleneck for PCSX2? With the power supply, I'm afraid to go any higher and the unusual form factor means it can't be easily replaced.

It looks good, the GT 240 shouldn't be a problem for most games at low resolutions. I somehow doubt all this can work with a 300W PSU though..
Excuse me for asking, but why are you building a mini-PC and not standard ATX O_O?

Build looks good for PCSX2 though. Might want to add an aftermarket CPU cooler to overclock the CPU though.
COOLER MASTER Geminii S is an aftermarket CPU cooler.
(04-09-2010, 08:09 AM)Bositman Wrote: [ -> ]It looks good, the GT 240 shouldn't be a problem for most games at low resolutions. I somehow doubt all this can work with a 300W PSU though..

It should work fine. Silverstone specifications say the power supply can output 300W continuous at 50C. The specifications actually mention up to a GTS250 being supported. However, I'm uncomfortable running it too close to its limits. Realistically, I'm probably looking at less than 150W load.

On Anandtech's review, a system with a Core i7 920 oc'ed to 3.33GHz with GT240 GDDR5 consumes 121W idle and 171W load. A Lynnfield running at stock or mild oc should consume much less.

(04-09-2010, 08:29 AM)sakraycore Wrote: [ -> ]Excuse me for asking, but why are you building a mini-PC and not standard ATX O_O?

Build looks good for PCSX2 though. Might want to add an aftermarket CPU cooler to overclock the CPU though.

Space constraints. This will be sitting on top of my current file server. Kinda hard to do that with a tower. There's an aftermarket CPU cooler (GeminII S) but I don't think I'll be doing any massive overclocks owing to the 300W power supply and excessive heat. Besides, building a low- to mid-level gaming machine in such tight confines would be a nice project.
(04-08-2010, 11:33 AM)ikazu Wrote: [ -> ]maybe in the future we can take advantage of those cores and divide them into 2 virtual cores (each virtual core consists of 2 cores). Well i said maybe and that doesn't mean it should or will happen at times like this.

Parallelism is something I'm very interested in as well. I have been a programmer for many years and have a limited amount of experience emulating hardware in software. Here is my 2 cents:

A lot of time during the execution of a program, you can't do more work until the current task is done, because the next task is entirely dependent on the results of the current task. For such tasks, be it virtual or non-virtual cores, hardware or software threads, it makes little difference what resources are available if the main thread is waiting in a loop for something to happen or complete. Usually a program that requires constant user input is going to not scale up very well with more threads.

An admittedly flawed car analogy that may illustrate this better.

If i gave you a car and a list of carefully arranged instructions that detail the absolute fastest way to get somewhere, I couldn't get you there any faster by giving you more cars. I'd have to give you a faster car to get you there sooner.

In a different scenario, If I have a list of places all around the city that I would like to have photos of, I could benefit from splitting the instructions up and handing out assignments to multiple drivers/cars, because it doesn't matter which order the pictures are taken, and it would be a lot faster than having one car travel the entire city.
(04-06-2010, 06:49 PM)Mello Wrote: [ -> ]intel pentium E5400 2.7 GHz
GT 240

How well will it run playing games like Xenosaga, Kingdom Hearts, and GTA?

6GB DDR3 Ram
320GB HDD

If more specs are needed although I'm not sure how much that will help out.
(04-09-2010, 06:39 PM)Mello Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-06-2010, 06:49 PM)Mello Wrote: [ -> ]intel pentium E5400 2.7 GHz
GT 240

How well will it run playing games like Xenosaga, Kingdom Hearts, and GTA?

6GB DDR3 Ram
320GB HDD

If more specs are needed although I'm not sure how much that will help out.

dunno about Xenosaga and GTA but kingdom hearts will definitly run full speed
as the old T5650(2ghz) of my previous laptop was enough to run it full speed
Heres my specs. I Bought a gateway desktop and upgraded the psu and gpu.

Here's the specs:

i3 @ 2.93 ghz
Coolmax 500w semi-modular psu
Visiontek HD Radeon 1 gb GDDR5 5770
6 gb DDR3 ram
Windows 7 Premium

What should I expect from most games?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665